Teams

KY/LOU/WEBBER/ GOODWIN

2025 USTA FALL 18 & Over · 4.0 Women

19 players · average NTRP 4.08 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-11-22vs KY/LOU/HALLER/GUSTAFSONWon 21
W#1 DoublesEl Shelton / Jessica Broughton vs Tannis Smith / Lisa Gustafson4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesShelby Russell vs Laura Cunningham3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesCaitlin Mann / Mary Beth Zarobsky vs Mary Adamchik / Deborah Wathen6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Abby Schuhmann
published 4.5
3.95
Caroline Ballard
published 4
3.95
Lindsey Webber
published
3.86
Lauren Whitsell
published
3.86
El Shelton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.85
Olivia Eberenz
published
3.84
Jessica Broughton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.83
3.82
Mary Beth Zarobsky
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Caitlin Mann
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Vanessa Ruppe
published
3.69
Amanda Matter
published 4
3.67
Mary Caroline Gray
published
3.65
Caroline Jordan
published 4
3.57
Keren Benabou
published
3.54
Kendra Purvis
published
3.37
Shelby Russell
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Kari Currie
published
Kayla Least
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Beth Zarobsky + Lauren Whitsell4253% games−1.5% vs expected
Jessica Broughton + El Shelton404 matchesnot enough data
Mary Beth Zarobsky + Christine Gilmore303 matchesnot enough data
Amanda Matter + Caroline Jordan213 matchesnot enough data
Lindsey Webber + Olivia Eberenz303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Abby Schuhmann
19W–5L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
4.06
4
Caroline Ballard
16W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.95
Lindsey Webber
7W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.95
Lauren Whitsell
27W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.86
El Shelton
14W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%15%
3.86
Olivia Eberenz
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.85
Jessica Broughton
19W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
3.84
4
Christine Gilmore
12W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.83
Mary Beth Zarobsky
23W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Caitlin Mann
9W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%8%
3.80
Vanessa Ruppe
20W–11L career · no lines in 2025
4%92%3%
3.74
4
Amanda Matter
10W–3L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Mary Caroline Gray
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Caroline Jordan
10W–13L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
Keren Benabou
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.57
Kendra Purvis
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.54
Shelby Russell
33W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
Kari Currie
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kayla Least
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.