Teams

V - Spanish Hills Swingers

2022 USTA Mixed 40 &Over - Ventura · Ventura - Mixed 40&Over 7.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.44 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-07-16vs V - Sunset Mixed4FunSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAmit Joshi / Sandhya Patel vs Ernie Sandlin / Nicole Mitchell6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJaye Heybl / Jill Heybl vs Sandi Lieu / Kimberlin Morley7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2022-06-25vs V - WAC BackhandersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesEric Heitman / Barbara Heitman vs Reza Afshar / Maryam Rassouli3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesJaye Heybl / Jill Heybl vs James Wilson / Patti Wilson4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-05-29vs V - Sunset PlayahsLost 01
L#3 DoublesBarbara Heitman / Eric Heitman vs Megan Mathews / Jeff Meinhart0-6, 6-1, 0-1
2022-05-21vs V - SherwoodLost 01
L#3 DoublesJaye Heybl / Jill Heybl vs Donna Oshatz / Kiumars Arfai4-6, 3-6
2022-04-24vs V - Wood Ranch Thorns N RosesLost 01
L#3 DoublesJill Heybl / Jaye Heybl vs Patricia Ameca / Jay Idea2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Mixed 40&Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Edwin Ramirez
published 4
3.49
Dana Hibner
published 3.5
3.36
Jon Boring
published
3.32
Barbara Heitman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Amit Joshi
published 3.5
3.24
Jill Heybl
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.21
Jaye Heybl
published
3.19
Adam Thomas
published 3.5
3.11
Pam Nesseth
published
3.09
Sandhya Patel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.79
Eric Heitman
published 3
Rachel Ramirez
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Edwin Ramirez
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.82
3.5
Dana Hibner
74W–72L career · no lines in 2022
<1%52%48%
3.49
Jon Boring
5W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Barbara Heitman
133W–149L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Amit Joshi
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Jill Heybl
107W–87L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
Jaye Heybl
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
99%1%<1%
3.21
3.5
Adam Thomas
9W–8L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Pam Nesseth
4W–12L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Sandhya Patel
53W–73L career · 1 line in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.09
3
Akshatha Gangadhar
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Eric Heitman
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rachel Ramirez
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.