Teams

2HV-MUNCY 2.5 COED SINGLES FALL SEM F1

2023 SEM FALL TEAM SINGLES · COED 2.5 SINGLES SEM

11 players · average NTRP 2.88 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 SinglesHeather Vance vs Minjuan Zhang5-7, 1-1
L#2 SinglesRebecca Washington vs Tiffany Mason4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesStephanie Dobronsky vs David Mellem1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesClaudia Muncy vs Ryan Said3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 SinglesMargot Lagowski vs Lisa Ewers2-6, 5-5
W#1 SinglesSUMMER CUFF vs Sara Jean Baker6-2, 6-3
L#2 SinglesBrandy Bar vs Moutamn Sadoun1-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesMarjorie Sarbaugh-Thompson vs Alexandra Millerman6-2, 3-2
L#1 SinglesRebecca Washington vs Emily Briceno0-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesKim Kanzawa vs Elizabeth Gonzalez6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesCecilia Fagan vs Korin Kustarz6-4, 4-5
W#1 SinglesHeather Vance vs Tiffany Mason6-3, 5-2
L#2 SinglesBrandy Bar vs Minjuan Zhang5-7, 0-4
L#3 SinglesYue Guo vs Sunny Jang1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesClaudia Muncy vs Logan Dimitrie3-6, 2-5
W#2 SinglesHeather Vance vs Ryan Said6-4, 3-2
L#3 SinglesMargot Lagowski vs Lisa Ewers6-7
W#1 SinglesSUMMER CUFF vs Audrey Urquhart6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesRebecca Washington vs John Gonek6-4, 6-2
W#3 SinglesMarjorie Sarbaugh-Thompson vs Eddie Abinoja6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesKim Kanzawa vs Mark Katakowski4-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesCecilia Fagan vs Suzanne Xuereb2-6, 4-4
W#3 SinglesStephanie Dobronsky vs Naomi Goldberg6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · COED 2.5 SINGLES SEM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
14FAC-MELLEM 2.5 COED SINGLES FALL SEM F1802139127
25FAC-BROOKS 2.5 COED SINGLES FALL SEM F262131124192
35LIB-INOUE 2.5 COED SINGLES FALL SEM F153141018149
42EAST-MCLEOD 2.5 COED SINGLES FALL SEM F244131122197
56WESS-SCHEPPER 2.5 COED SINGLES FALL SEM F244111327201
62HV-MUNCY 2.5 COED SINGLES FALL SEM F135111324190
71WESS-KELLY 2.5 COED SINGLES FALL SEM F235121224206
84EAST-REID 2.5 COED SINGLES FALL SEM F235111326190
91CHIP-THOMPSON 2.5 COED SINGLES FALL SEM F12681632223
103FAC-URQUHART 2.5 COED SINGLES FALL SEM F12661838245

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Heather Vance
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.79
SUMMER CUFF
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.76
Claudia Muncy
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.72
Yue Guo
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.58
Kim Kanzawa
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.57
Cecilia Fagan
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
2.54
Rebecca Washington
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.37
Margot Lagowski
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.36
Brandy Bar
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.10
Marjorie Sarbaugh-Thompson
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Stephanie Dobronsky
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Washington + Kim Kanzawa4452% games+3.7% vs expected
Marjorie Sarbaugh-Thompson + Rebecca Washington1534% gamesnot enough data
SUMMER CUFF + Kim Kanzawa2349% gamesnot enough data
Yue Guo + Rebecca Washington224 matchesnot enough data
Margot Lagowski + Kim Kanzawa224 matchesnot enough data
Cecilia Fagan + Rebecca Washington134 matchesnot enough data
Marjorie Sarbaugh-Thompson + Yue Guo123 matchesnot enough data
Yue Guo + Kim Kanzawa123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Heather Vance
79W–35L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%11%89%
3.16
3
SUMMER CUFF
45W–46L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Claudia Muncy
43W–41L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%94%3%
2.76
Yue Guo
69W–107L career · 1 line in 2023
5%94%2%
2.72
Kim Kanzawa
46W–45L career · 2 lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
2.58
3
Cecilia Fagan
37W–67L career · type A · 2 lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
2.57
3
Rebecca Washington
42W–71L career · 3 lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
2.54
2.5
Margot Lagowski
27W–32L career · 2 lines in 2023
0%84%16%
2.37
3
Brandy Bar
13W–17L career · type A · 2 lines in 2023
86%14%<1%
2.36
2.5
Marjorie Sarbaugh-Thompson
24W–71L career · 2 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Stephanie Dobronsky
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.