Teams

Cowbells

2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - TWIN FALLS · Women 3.5 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.19 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-26vs RaqueteersWon 32
W#1 DoublesJamie King / Nicole Rowley vs Kari Brose / Elizabeth Lassen6-4, 6-0
L#1 SinglesKelsey Skinner vs Jena Clayville0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesConnie Maughan / Rachel Sandersfeld vs Annette Barnum / Judy Graf5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJennifer Vargo vs Melissa Lewis5-6
W#3 DoublesJordan Head / Wendy Davis vs Susan Whitney / Desiree Hettinga6-3, 7-5
2025-06-19vs RaqueteersWon 32
L#1 DoublesNicole Rowley / Kelsey Skinner vs Judy Graf / Annette Barnum4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJamie King vs Shana Hoge6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesConnie Maughan / Rachel Sandersfeld vs Elizabeth Lassen / Nancy Silva7-6, 6-4
W#2 SinglesJennifer Vargo vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesAmy Bearden / Wendy Davis vs Kelcie Dickerson / Kari Brose0-6, 1-6
2025-06-12vs RaqueteersLost 14
L#1 DoublesWendy Davis / Nicole Rowley vs Annette Barnum / Nancy Silva6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJamie King vs Melissa Lewis2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Bearden / Jordan Head vs Judy Graf / Kelcie Dickerson2-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesJennifer Vargo vs Desiree Hettinga6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesCatherine Daily / Kelsey Skinner vs Susan Whitney / Shana Hoge4-6, 0-6
2025-06-05vs RaqueteersWon 41
W#1 DoublesNicole Rowley / Jennifer Vargo vs Jena Clayville / Kari Brose6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJamie King vs Desiree Hettinga6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCatherine Daily / Kelsey Skinner vs Annette Barnum / Judy Graf3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesJordan Head vs Shana Hoge6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRachel Sandersfeld / Connie Maughan vs Susan Whitney / Nancy Silva7-5, 6-2
2025-05-29vs RaqueteersLost 23
W#1 DoublesNicole Rowley / Jordan Head vs Judy Graf / Kelcie Dickerson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesRachel Sandersfeld vs Melissa Lewis0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKelsey Skinner / Amy Bearden vs Shana Hoge / Kari Brose0-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesCatherine Daily vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesConnie Maughan / Wendy Davis vs Jena Clayville / Susan Whitney0-6, 0-6
2025-05-22vs RaqueteersLost 14
L#1 DoublesNicole Rowley / Amy Bearden vs Annette Barnum / Nancy Silva3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJamie King vs Jena Clayville3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesConnie Maughan / Wendy Davis vs Elizabeth Lassen / Kathy Rex6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesJordan Head vs Shana Hoge6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCatherine Daily / Rachel Sandersfeld vs Susan Whitney / Judy Graf1-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 3.5 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Raqueteers33161431240
2Cowbells33141634258

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Jennifer Vargo
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.25
Nicole Rowley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Rachel Sandersfeld
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.01
Jamie King
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.86
Connie Maughan
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.84
Kelsey Skinner
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.67
Wendy Davis
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.62
Amy Bearden
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.48
Catherine Daily
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
Jordan Head
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicole Rowley + Jennifer Vargo3353% games+8.1% vs expected
Connie Maughan + Wendy Davis1441% games−16.5% vs expected
Connie Maughan + Nicole Rowley033 matchesnot enough data
Connie Maughan + Rachel Sandersfeld303 matchesnot enough data
Connie Maughan + Catherine Daily213 matchesnot enough data
Nicole Rowley + Jamie King213 matchesnot enough data
Catherine Daily + Jennifer Vargo123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jennifer Vargo
32W–43L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.36
3.5
Nicole Rowley
17W–31L career · 6 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.25
3.5
Rachel Sandersfeld
16W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Jamie King
24W–23L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.01
3
Connie Maughan
53W–75L career · type A · 5 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.86
3
Kelsey Skinner
7W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%87%13%
2.84
3
Wendy Davis
8W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Amy Bearden
7W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
2.62
3
Catherine Daily
13W–59L career · 4 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.48
Jordan Head
9W–3L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.