Teams

Let's Duo this

2025 FLEX DYNAMIC DUO · Women 4.0

4 players · average NTRP 4.00 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-09-23vs Twice the FunWon 20
W#1 SinglesAda Hansen vs Kristen Boyd6-1
W#2 SinglesAshley Tribble vs Joanne Cornwell6-2
2025-09-22vs Jackie & KhloeWon 20
W#1 SinglesAda Hansen vs Khloe Kyllonen6-2
W#2 SinglesSuzanne Baran vs Jackie Johnson6-2
2025-09-14vs Twice the FunWon 20
W#1 SinglesAda Hansen vs Kristen Boyd6-1
W#2 SinglesRebecca Kochvar vs Margot Gilna6-3
2025-09-12vs Simply SmashingLost 02
L#1 SinglesRebecca Kochvar vs Jee Hur0-6
L#2 SinglesSuzanne Baran vs Courtney Hobbs0-6
2025-09-04vs Jackie & KhloeWon 20
W#1 SinglesAda Hansen vs Khloe Kyllonen6-1
W#2 SinglesRebecca Kochvar vs Jackie Johnson6-1
2025-09-03Won 20
W#1 SinglesAshley Tribble vs N/A6-0
W#2 SinglesAda Hansen vs N/A6-0
2025-08-19vs Twice the FunWon 20
W#1 SinglesSuzanne Baran vs Margot Gilna6-3
W#2 SinglesAshley Tribble vs Kristen Boyd6-1
2025-08-18vs Simply SmashingLost 02
L#1 SinglesAda Hansen vs Jee Hur4-6
L#2 SinglesRebecca Kochvar vs Courtney Hobbs1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · Women 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Simply Smashing60162245
2Let's Duo this62195566
3Twice the Fun2762121142
4Jackie & Khloe1641717111

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Ada Hansen
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 4
3.88
Ashley Tribble
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.77
Rebecca Kochvar
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.66
Suzanne Baran
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ada Hansen + Ashley Tribble404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ada Hansen
252W–86L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.97
4
Ashley Tribble
182W–147L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.88
4
Rebecca Kochvar
104W–62L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Suzanne Baran
212W–163L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.