Teams

Twice the Fun

2025 FLEX DYNAMIC DUO · Women 4.0

3 players · average NTRP 4.00 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-09-28vs Jackie & KhloeSplit 11
L#1 SinglesJoanne Cornwell vs Khloe Kyllonen3-6
W#2 SinglesMargot Gilna vs Jackie Johnson6-4
2025-09-25vs Simply SmashingLost 02
L#1 SinglesJoanne Cornwell vs Courtney Hobbs2-6
L#2 SinglesKristen Boyd vs Jeanna Rice4-6
2025-09-23vs Let's Duo thisLost 02
L#1 SinglesKristen Boyd vs Ada Hansen1-6
L#2 SinglesJoanne Cornwell vs Ashley Tribble2-6
2025-09-14vs Let's Duo thisLost 02
L#1 SinglesKristen Boyd vs Ada Hansen1-6
L#2 SinglesMargot Gilna vs Rebecca Kochvar3-6
2025-09-10vs Jackie & KhloeLost 02
L#1 SinglesMargot Gilna vs Khloe Kyllonen0-6
L#2 SinglesKristen Boyd vs Jackie Johnson2-6
2025-09-05vs Simply SmashingLost 02
L#1 SinglesMargot Gilna vs Courtney Hobbs1-6
L#2 SinglesKristen Boyd vs Kelly Sturdy3-6
2025-08-29vs Simply SmashingSplit 11
L#1 SinglesKristen Boyd vs Courtney Hobbs0-6
W#2 SinglesMargot Gilna vs Kelly Sturdy6-0
2025-08-19vs Let's Duo thisLost 02
L#1 SinglesMargot Gilna vs Suzanne Baran3-6
L#2 SinglesKristen Boyd vs Ashley Tribble1-6
2025-08-11vs Jackie & KhloeSplit 11
W#1 SinglesJoanne Cornwell vs Jackie Johnson6-0
L#2 SinglesMargot Gilna vs Khloe Kyllonen2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · Women 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Simply Smashing60162245
2Let's Duo this62195566
3Twice the Fun2762121142
4Jackie & Khloe1641717111

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Joanne Cornwell
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.60
Margot Gilna
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #1 Singles 43% · published 4
3.58
Kristen Boyd
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #1 Singles 43% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joanne Cornwell + Margot Gilna14761% games+5.8% vs expected
Joanne Cornwell + Kristen Boyd314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Joanne Cornwell
174W–140L career · 4 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.67
4
Margot Gilna
84W–66L career · 7 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.60
4
Kristen Boyd
26W–45L career · 7 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.58

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.