Teams

PLEASANTON 18AW3.5A

2024 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 3.5

23 players · average NTRP 3.61 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Amy Yang
published 4
3.73
Ria Nickens
published
3.70
Relura Horton
published
3.68
Debbie Alster
published 4
3.63
Viviana Meyer
published
3.58
Jessica Edson
published
3.57
Kelly Sanchez
published
3.40
Jill Carlstrom
published
3.39
Stefanie Cohen
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.35
Rebecca Kay
published
3.35
Heidi Kapust
published 3.5
3.28
Emily Amott
published 3.5
3.28
April Mundy
published 3.5
3.26
Kayla Baier
published
Ali Rago
published 3.5
Betsy Gwynn
published 3.5
3.15
Amy Bull
published 3.5
3.12
Rosalynd Zahiri
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Romeda Arsanjani
published
3.02
Melissa Sano
published
Jessica Ford
published
Rebecca Arguello
published
Robin Hultgren
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heidi Kapust + Jill Carlstrom5153% games+4.7% vs expected
Stefanie Cohen + Kayla Baier123 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Sano + Amy Bull033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amy Yang
26W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
3.85
Ria Nickens
11W–8L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.73
Relura Horton
17W–8L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Debbie Alster
9W–7L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.68
Viviana Meyer
13W–13L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
3.63
Jessica Edson
24W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%28%72%
3.58
Kelly Sanchez
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
28%71%<1%
3.57
Jill Carlstrom
16W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.40
Stefanie Cohen
72W–42L career · 15 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.39
Rebecca Kay
24W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Heidi Kapust
18W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Emily Amott
10W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
April Mundy
8W–3L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.28
Kayla Baier
13W–7L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Ali Rago
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Betsy Gwynn
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Amy Bull
10W–9L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Rosalynd Zahiri
94W–58L career · 9 lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
3.12
Romeda Arsanjani
8W–17L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.10
Melissa Sano
7W–18L career · no lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
3.02
Jessica Ford
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rebecca Arguello
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Robin Hultgren
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.