Teams

Fermstad- Fall Top 40

2022 ADULT 40 & OVER EARLY START · 4.0 MEN

8 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-11-11vs Longshots 2022 ESWon 10
W#2 DoublesHernando Gonzalez / MATTHEW Hintz vs Raj Pillai / Jerome Hartmann2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-11-04Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTim Theobald / Hernando Gonzalez vs Greg Elfstrum / Aaron Rosenbery2-6, 0-6
2021-10-07vs HammargrenLost 01
L#1 DoublesJim Terhaar / Hernando Gonzalez vs Jesse Radabaugh / Tom Pfenning2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Robert Malecki
published
James Riley
published 4
3.61
Hernando Gonzalez
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.60
Jim Terhaar
published
3.54
Lucas Tesh
published
3.46
Mark Gness
published
3.39
Derek Fermstad
published 3.5
3.07
Tim Theobald
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lucas Tesh + Jim Terhaar2441% games−18.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robert Malecki
3W–8L career · no lines in 2022
79%21%<1%
3.90
4
James Riley
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Hernando Gonzalez
10W–36L career · 3 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.61
Jim Terhaar
9W–25L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
Lucas Tesh
6W–26L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.54
Mark Gness
15W–21L career · no lines in 2022
62%38%<1%
3.46
3.5
Derek Fermstad
37W–32L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.39
Tim Theobald
40W–41L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.