Teams

Longshots 2022 ES

2022 ADULT 40 & OVER EARLY START · 4.0 MEN

8 players · average NTRP / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-12-09vs Bartell 4.0 40s ES22Won 10
W#2 DoublesMike Jones / Michael Kasner vs Aaron Rosenbery / Gary Dickenson4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-11-18vs Swillers ES 22Won 10
W#3 DoublesMike Jones / Joel Haggerty vs Paul Friedland / Andrew Baumel6-4, 6-1
2021-11-11vs Fermstad- Fall Top 40Won 10
W#3 DoublesMike Jones / Reed Krider vs Lucas Tesh / James Riley4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-11-04vs HammargrenWon 10
W#2 DoublesReed Krider / Mike Jones vs Michael Torres / Roshan Rajkumar6-2, 6-1
2021-10-28Won 10
W#2 DoublesMike Jones / Michael Kasner vs Nathan Moretter-Bue / Brian Koskey6-4, 6-4
2021-10-21vs Lassow/Craig- Double BagelWon 10
W#3 DoublesMike Jones / James Robertson vs Joshua Sillers / Fadil Dobraca6-3, 6-1
2021-10-14vs Bartell 4.0 40s ES22Won 10
W#3 DoublesMike Jones / Scott Holm vs Steven Casperson / Mark Olson3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2021-10-07vs Sebring 2022 Early StartLost 01
L#2 DoublesJames Robertson / Mike Jones vs Daniel Sebring / Sean Zindren4-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.20
Reed Krider
published
3.87
Mark van Ert
published
3.78
Raj Pillai
published
3.63
Joseph McGonigle
published
Jason Muhl
published
Jerome Hartmann
published
Joel Haggerty
published
Mike Jones
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Reed Krider
13W–16L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
4.20
Mark van Ert
20W–44L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
3.87
Raj Pillai
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.78
Joseph McGonigle
5W–18L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.63
Jason Muhl
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jerome Hartmann
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Joel Haggerty
8W–15L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mike Jones
118W–62L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.