Teams

Sebring 2022 Early Start

2022 ADULT 40 & OVER EARLY START · 4.0 MEN

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-12-09vs Duwearatchi/Ballentine 40+Won 10
W#1 DoublesSam Hobbs / Sean Zindren vs Craig Ballentine / John Ulman6-1, 6-3
2021-12-02vs Longshots 2022 ESWon 10
W#2 DoublesSean Zindren / Sam Hobbs vs Reed Krider / Michael Kasner6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2021-11-18Won 10
W#2 DoublesSam Hobbs / Sean Zindren vs Larry Bach / Miguel Padilla6-4, 6-2
2021-11-04vs Swillers ES 22Won 10
W#2 DoublesSam Hobbs / Sean Zindren vs David Goodman / Bill Sommers6-3, 6-3
2021-10-28vs Fermstad- Fall Top 40Won 10
W#2 DoublesSam Hobbs / Patrick Selchow vs Lucas Tesh / Justin MacK6-1, 7-5
2021-10-21vs HammargrenWon 10
W#1 DoublesSam Hobbs / Sean Zindren vs John Niedfeldt-Thomas / Jesse Radabaugh6-4, 6-2
2021-10-14Won 10
W#2 DoublesSam Hobbs / Kenneth Gutzman vs John Waslif / John Anderson6-3, 6-3
2021-10-07vs Longshots 2022 ESLost 01
L#1 DoublesSam Hobbs / Kenneth Gutzman vs Jason Muhl / Raj Pillai4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Sam Hobbs
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.82
Kenneth Gutzman
published
3.82
Pablo Levi
published
3.79
Mark Matijasevich
published
3.75
Tony Mosser
published
3.74
Daniel Sebring
published 4
3.60
Eric Ziegler
published 4
3.52
Scott Emmons
published
3.52
Robert Wyly
published
Peter Puster
published
Sean Zindren
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robert Wyly + Kenneth Gutzman2352% games−7.3% vs expected
Robert Wyly + Daniel Sebring213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Sam Hobbs
249W–170L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.90
Kenneth Gutzman
14W–14L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.82
Pablo Levi
13W–14L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
Mark Matijasevich
14W–11L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
Tony Mosser
10W–31L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Daniel Sebring
6W–15L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Eric Ziegler
3W–9L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
Scott Emmons
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
3.52
Robert Wyly
9W–16L career · no lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
3.52
Peter Puster
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sean Zindren
9W–20L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.