Teams

NIN SB 40&O 3.5 M: SBRC Striegel/Desch

NIN SB Adult 40 & Over · NIN SB 40 & Over 3.5 Men

5 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTHERN INDIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-27vs NIN SB 40&O 3.5 M: LP JansonLost 02
L#1 DoublesTim Denniston / Steve Caurro vs Robert Pickering / Joerg Burfien5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Desch / Maurice Alkemade vs Michael Levy / Kenneth Brinker3-6, 3-6
2026-07-13Split 11
L#1 DoublesRoger Brady / Tim Denniston vs Deron Gerber / Mike Thielen7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRamon Fernandez / Tengfei Luo vs Gary Clarkson / Fred Harris Jr7-6, 6-4
2026-07-06vs NIN SB 40&O 3.5 M: LP JansonLost 02
L#1 DoublesAaron Striegel / Roger Brady vs Brian Harker / Barry Pontius3-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesMichael Szemborski / Michael Desch vs Rob Parker / Michael Gogola2-6, 1-6
2026-06-22Won 20
W#1 DoublesTim Denniston / Gary Sanders vs Daniel Schwartz / Dan Cory6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesAaron Dingler vs Justin Budzinski6-2, 6-2
2026-06-15vs NIN SB 40&O 3.5 M: LP JansonWon 30
W#1 DoublesAaron Dingler / Roger Brady vs Qasim Asghar / Michael Gogola7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTim Denniston / Gary Sanders vs Brian Harker / Danas Lapkus7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAaron Striegel / Steve Caurro vs Michael Levy / Robert Pickering6-4, 6-2
2026-06-01Won 21
W#1 DoublesAaron Dingler / Tim Denniston vs David Negron / Justin Budzinski5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTengfei Luo / Frank Germann vs Gary Clarkson / Mike Thielen4-6, 2-6
W#4 DoublesAaron Striegel / Michael Desch vs Fred Harris Jr / Jim Deren6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · NIN SB 40 & Over 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NIN SB 40&O 3.5 M: LP Janson6023715186
2NIN SB 40&O 3.5 M: SBRC Striegel/Desch24121840306
3NIN SB 40&O 3.5 M: LP Harris/Clarkson15102043302

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Aaron Dingler
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.31
Aaron Striegel
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Tim Denniston
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.19
Michael Desch
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Tengfei Luo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Aaron Dingler
7W–3L career · type D · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
3.5
Aaron Striegel
37W–81L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Tim Denniston
62W–69L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
Michael Desch
28W–33L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Tengfei Luo
13W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.