Teams

BC-MiraCosta/TsukasaMatsumoto

2023 SOCAL DOUBLES - Beach Cities · BC Women - 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.86 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-11-19vs BC-ErnieHowlett/MinaRicabarLost 02
L#1 DoublesTsukasa Matsumoto / Anne Pila vs MINA RICABAR / Ryan Hickman4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesSayaka Meguri / Juli Vadney vs Margaret Gray / Tami Reyes4-6, 4-6
2023-11-05vs BC-MCC/JhoannaTorresLost 01
L#2 DoublesAki Takeda / Juli Vadney vs Serene Peterson / Jill Halkias3-6, 4-6
2023-10-22vs BC-PVTC/GalenaMiller-HoriiWon 10
W#1 DoublesTakako Kato / Juli Vadney vs Venita McLay / Michelle Rosen6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2023-10-15vs BC-Kramer/SophieSokolowLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnne Pila / Belmarie Huynh vs Carly Capper / Melanie Archer2-6, 5-7
2023-10-01vs BC-AltaVista/GaiOdanakaLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnne Pila / Yoko Ishizuka vs Yumiko Tokiwa / Laura Chasin4-6, 0-6
2023-09-30vs BC-WestEnd/KellyWongWon 20
W#1 DoublesJuli Vadney / Takako Kato vs Eileen Kaiser / Terumi Barrett6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnne Pila / Yoko Ishizuka vs Pamela Milroy / Denise Vega6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2023-09-03vs BC-BJKTC/JosephineGarrettSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJuli Vadney / Sayaka Meguri vs Cathy Jackson / Liz Kirksey3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAnne Pila / Tsukasa Matsumoto vs Rachel Aelion-Moss / Josephine Garrett6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Women - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Anne Pila
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.74
Aki Takeda
published 4
3.72
Ashlee Sato
published 4
3.72
Riho Nakano
published 4
3.69
Yoko Ishizuka
published
3.66
Juli Vadney
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.41
Stephanie Trueman
published
3.28
Belmarie Huynh
published 3.5
3.08
Christine Bucklin
published 3.5
LISA MANCE
published
Reiko Sasagawa
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Riho Nakano + Anne Pila404 matchesnot enough data
Belmarie Huynh + Anne Pila213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anne Pila
121W–42L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%52%48%
3.99
4
Aki Takeda
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.74
4
Ashlee Sato
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Riho Nakano
92W–67L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
Yoko Ishizuka
7W–10L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.69
4
Juli Vadney
55W–56L career · 5 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.66
Stephanie Trueman
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
74%26%<1%
3.41
3.5
Belmarie Huynh
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Christine Bucklin
26W–35L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.08
LISA MANCE
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Reiko Sasagawa
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.