Teams

BC-BJKTC/JosephineGarrett

2023 SOCAL DOUBLES - Beach Cities · BC Women - 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-11-05vs BC-AltaVista/GaiOdanakaLost 03
L#1 DoublesLaurette Jennings / Sue Magnall vs Evelyn Yanke / Kayla Yanke2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCathy Jackson / Liz Kirksey vs Laura Chasin / Yumiko Tokiwa0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesYolanda Barocio / Josephine Garrett vs H Kim Duong / Yumi Yamamoto1-6, 1-6
2023-10-29vs BC-WestEnd/KellyWongLost 12
W#1 DoublesCathy Jackson / Terri Rasmussen vs Shubha Chick / Rebecca Chavira6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRachel Aelion-Moss / Liz Kirksey vs Sayaka Amano / Terumi Barrett1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesYolanda Barocio / Jenniffer Wong vs KC Jones / Charmaine Nielsen5-7, 6-7
2023-10-22vs BC-ErnieHowlett/MinaRicabarLost 03
L#1 DoublesEmalyn Anthony / Yolanda Barocio vs Tami Reyes / Margaret Gray4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRachel Aelion-Moss / Sue Magnall vs MINA RICABAR / Ryan Hickman5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChar Geary / Terri Rasmussen vs Ayca Miller / Jocelyn Maye6-7, 4-6
2023-10-15vs BC-MCC/RachelAlexanderLost 12
W#1 DoublesTerri Rasmussen / Stacy Tzur vs Denise Wolf / Elizabeth Alexander6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCheryl Gates / Sue Magnall vs Ethylene Ziegler / Pamela Lopez1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLiz Kirksey / Vanessa Paul vs Kristina Mohr / Kirsten Helvey3-6, 1-6
2023-10-08vs BC-MCC/JhoannaTorresSplit 11
W#1 DoublesStacy Tzur / Terri Rasmussen vs Kristina Schrader / Heidi Weber6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesChar Geary / Yolanda Barocio vs Frances Hong / Julie Tendoesschate3-6, 5-7
W#1 DoublesTerri Rasmussen / Stacy Tzur vs Lena Loha / Kimberly Buchan6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesEmalyn Anthony / Yolanda Barocio vs Chloe Kishel / VICKY TRINH6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLaurette Jennings / Liz Kirksey vs Jennifer Lee / Gia Bao Le2-6, 2-6
2023-09-24vs BC-Kramer/SophieSokolowSplit 11
L#1 DoublesEmalyn Anthony / Jenniffer Wong vs Carly Capper / Melanie Archer3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesRachel Aelion-Moss / Liz Kirksey vs Leslie Royles / Keiko Marumoto6-3, 6-4
2023-09-17vs BC-PVTC/GalenaMiller-HoriiSplit 11
L#1 DoublesStacy Tzur / Liz Kirksey vs Michelle Alford / Randi Young7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEmalyn Anthony / Jenniffer Wong vs Teena Wapner / Jacqueline Geiger6-1, 6-3
2023-09-03vs BC-MiraCosta/TsukasaMatsumotoWon 10
W#2 DoublesCathy Jackson / Liz Kirksey vs Juli Vadney / Sayaka Meguri6-3, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Women - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Emalyn Anthony
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Christine Callas
published 4
3.75
Cathy Jackson
published 4
3.73
Terri Rasmussen
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.64
Cheryl Gates
published 4
3.62
Susie Kim
published
3.61
Yolanda Barocio
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.53
Sue Magnall
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.48
Stacy Tzur
published
3.47
Liz Kirksey
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.38
Char Geary
published 4
3.33
Jenniffer Wong
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.22
Josephine Garrett
published
Vanessa Paul
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Terri Rasmussen + Cathy Jackson9165% games+2.4% vs expected
Jenniffer Wong + Yolanda Barocio1442% gamesnot enough data
Sue Magnall + Yolanda Barocio213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Emalyn Anthony
106W–57L career · 4 lines in 2023
14%86%1%
4.15
4
Christine Callas
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Cathy Jackson
12W–8L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.75
4
Terri Rasmussen
136W–90L career · 5 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Cheryl Gates
16W–12L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.64
Susie Kim
14W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%20%80%
3.62
4
Yolanda Barocio
136W–211L career · 5 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.61
Sue Magnall
33W–43L career · 3 lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.53
Stacy Tzur
5W–20L career · no lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
3.48
Liz Kirksey
111W–98L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
3.47
4
Char Geary
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
80%20%<1%
3.38
3.5
Jenniffer Wong
200W–169L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
Josephine Garrett
7W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%6%94%
3.22
Vanessa Paul
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.