Teams

BC-MCC/RachelAlexander

2023 SOCAL DOUBLES - Beach Cities · BC Women - 4.0

19 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-10-15vs BC-BJKTC/JosephineGarrettWon 20
W#2 DoublesEthylene Ziegler / Pamela Lopez vs Cheryl Gates / Sue Magnall6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKristina Mohr / Kirsten Helvey vs Liz Kirksey / Vanessa Paul6-3, 6-1
2023-10-08vs BC-MiraCosta/TsukasaMatsumotoLost 01
L#2 DoublesJen Hall / Ethylene Ziegler vs Stephanie Trueman / Sayaka Meguri2-6, 5-7
2023-09-17vs BC-AltaVista/GaiOdanakaLost 01
L#2 DoublesJen Hall / Ethylene Ziegler vs Donna Leventhal / Nancy Closson0-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesErin Freeman / MaryAnn Burns vs Demi Dang / Shirley Fong4-6, 2-6
2023-09-03vs BC-WestEnd/KellyWongSplit 11
W#1 DoublesErin Freeman / Renee Tinker vs Charmaine Nielsen / Denise Vega6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRachel Alexander / Kirsten Helvey vs Shubha Chick / Kelly Wong2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Women - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Kirsten Helvey
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.80
Pamela Lopez
published
3.78
Stephanie Twombley
published
Amy Karr
published 4
3.75
Beth Rager
published 4
3.73
Renee Tinker
published
3.71
Mariel VandenHengel
published
3.71
Ethylene Ziegler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Linda Lai
published
3.68
Elizabeth Alexander
published
3.64
Amanda Kresser
published 4
3.63
Sarah Nedelman
published
3.56
Layla Kiffin
published
3.51
Kristina Mohr
published
3.48
Erin Freeman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Kimberly Graham
published
3.11
Rachel Alexander
published
Frankie Read
published
MaryAnn Burns
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Freeman + Ethylene Ziegler123 matchesnot enough data
Ethylene Ziegler + Kimberly Graham213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kirsten Helvey
123W–71L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.88
Pamela Lopez
21W–8L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.80
Stephanie Twombley
23W–15L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Amy Karr
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Beth Rager
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.75
Renee Tinker
3W–10L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
Mariel VandenHengel
31W–31L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.71
Ethylene Ziegler
87W–63L career · 3 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.71
Linda Lai
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.69
Elizabeth Alexander
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Amanda Kresser
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.64
Sarah Nedelman
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.63
Layla Kiffin
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.56
Kristina Mohr
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.51
Erin Freeman
23W–21L career · 2 lines in 2023
57%43%<1%
3.48
Kimberly Graham
38W–35L career · no lines in 2023
98%2%<1%
3.20
Rachel Alexander
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.11
Frankie Read
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
MaryAnn Burns
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.