Teams

LCTA40/HildrethMathewes/SneeFarm

STA 40 & Over Combo Doubles · 40 & Over Combo Women - 6.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-09-04vs LCTA40/Barkley/MPRWon 30
W#1 DoublesAlexandra Wright / Heidi Hildreth vs Suzie Smith / Denyse Barkley6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesStephanie Godfrey / Melissa Kubu vs Karen Lewis / Amy Jarck6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesZuhal Bulut / Stacey Kinney vs Mary Young / Annie Thigpen6-4, 6-2
2025-08-07vs LCTA40/MillerCirifalco/DunesWestWon 30
W#1 DoublesHeidi Hildreth / MELONYE EVANS vs Paige Hall / Jennifer Breen6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesZuhal Bulut / Kelli Humphrey vs Anne Underkofler / Denise Barsness6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesErika Blankenship / Jean Fifield vs Amanda Mammele / Denise Lauer6-2, 6-2
2025-07-31vs LCTA40/Seblonka/BrickyardWon 21
W#1 DoublesErika Blankenship / Stacey Kinney vs Felecia Wermuth / Sharon Gerald6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesHeidi Hildreth / Lauren Hansen vs Dana Seblonka / Meta Boals6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBeth Hasty / Daniela Hoag vs Minhthu Nguyen / Kathy Carr4-6, 6-7
2025-07-10vs LCTA40/Anderson/CreeksideLost 03
L#1 DoublesKimberly Mathewes / Stacey Kinney vs Currie Boyd / Sarah Sass2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJennifer Smith / Melissa Kubu vs Katherine Pauli / Stacey Powell3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesHeidi Hildreth / Lauren Hansen vs Amy Anderson / Candace Levy4-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Combo Women - 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Alexandra Wright
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.73
MELONYE EVANS
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.27
Kimberly Mathewes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Stephanie Godfrey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Melissa Kubu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Beth Hasty
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Stacey Kinney
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.18
Erika Blankenship
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.99
Jean Fifield
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Zuhal Bulut
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.79
Heidi Hildreth
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Daniela Hoag
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Kelli Humphrey
published
Lauren Hansen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Mathewes + MELONYE EVANS9173% games+20.9% vs expected
Stephanie Godfrey + Stacey Kinney5267% games+17.0% vs expected
Kimberly Mathewes + Stephanie Godfrey7163% games+16.5% vs expected
MELONYE EVANS + Alexandra Wright5077% games+11.3% vs expected
Stephanie Godfrey + Erika Blankenship20664% games+10.2% vs expected
Kimberly Mathewes + Heidi Hildreth4258% games+9.8% vs expected
Zuhal Bulut + Stacey Kinney20463% games+9.0% vs expected
Erika Blankenship + Stacey Kinney9458% games+4.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alexandra Wright
83W–18L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.92
MELONYE EVANS
107W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.73
Kimberly Mathewes
70W–33L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Stephanie Godfrey
85W–31L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
Melissa Kubu
32W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Beth Hasty
30W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Stacey Kinney
87W–58L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
Erika Blankenship
90W–34L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Jean Fifield
37W–61L career · 1 line in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.99
Zuhal Bulut
56W–34L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
2.98
Heidi Hildreth
71W–47L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Daniela Hoag
40W–36L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kelli Humphrey
7W–19L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lauren Hansen
19W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.