Teams

RINCONADA PK 18AW4.0A

2023 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 4.0

20 players · average NTRP 4.33 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.94 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.23
Daniella Holm
published 4.5
4.23
Giana Flores
published
4.22
Veeraya Pupatwibul
published
4.20
Kristine Tan
published
4.17
Jennifer Jin
published
4.15
ALEXANDRA KIRCHICK
published 4.5
4.12
Winnie Zhang
published
4.10
Velislava Balin
published
4.04
Jenny Wang
published
4.00
Samantha Herman
published
3.90
Manasa Gadde
published
3.85
Jacqueline Lam
published
3.85
Lisa Cabassa
published
3.81
Kristina Weaver
published
3.81
Yui Tantiyavarong
published
3.80
Teresa Low
published
3.66
Amanda Kao
published 4
3.64
Sharon Huang
published
3.54
Nancy Wu
published
3.38
Rina Tsujimoto
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Veeraya Pupatwibul + Winnie Zhang7454% games+9.4% vs expected
Jennifer Jin + Kristine Tan314 matchesnot enough data
Yui Tantiyavarong + ALEXANDRA KIRCHICK123 matchesnot enough data
Daniella Holm + Veeraya Pupatwibul213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Daniella Holm
26W–15L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
4.23
Giana Flores
7W–9L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
4.23
Veeraya Pupatwibul
23W–16L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
4.22
Kristine Tan
18W–19L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
4.20
Jennifer Jin
19W–9L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
4.17
4.5
ALEXANDRA KIRCHICK
12W–12L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
4.15
Winnie Zhang
13W–25L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
4.12
Velislava Balin
3W–15L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
4.10
Jenny Wang
19W–32L career · no lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
4.04
Samantha Herman
16W–17L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
4.00
Manasa Gadde
7W–20L career · no lines in 2023
76%24%<1%
3.90
Jacqueline Lam
5W–13L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%15%
3.85
Lisa Cabassa
12W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%14%
3.85
Kristina Weaver
13W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.81
Yui Tantiyavarong
6W–28L career · no lines in 2023
92%8%<1%
3.81
Teresa Low
10W–4L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Amanda Kao
10W–16L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%1%
3.66
Sharon Huang
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.64
Nancy Wu
14W–10L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.54
Rina Tsujimoto
5W–23L career · no lines in 2023
79%21%<1%
3.38

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.