Teams

LA - Double Trouble 7.0

2026 USTA MxD 40 & Over - LA · LA - 7.0 Mixed Doubles

15 players · average NTRP 3.83 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-22vs LA - Strings AttachedLost 03
L#1 DoublesLea Taylor / John Cox vs Stephen Kim / Sarah Lim5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTsion Dawit / Michael McMullin vs Christopher Lozinski / Julie Rhee0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesIris Cox / Tomas Romero vs Juan Pereira / Lilit Khatchaturian2-6, 3-6
2026-08-08vs LA - Mooney MatesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesIris Cox / Tomas Romero vs Martina Savitt / Christopher Schrader1-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesErik Marroquin / Heidi Reed vs Trudy Kao / Jagor Zhizhenka6-1, 6-2
2026-08-01vs LA - Canyon Coyotes MixedLost 03
L#1 DoublesChristine Watson / Edward Wedding vs Christine Russell / Michael Iguidez1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Chan / Andrew Dillard vs Joy Cho / Artin Davodian3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLea Taylor / Norman Jones vs Meaghan Curcio / Raul Fernandez4-6, 3-6
2026-07-26vs LA - Tightly Strung MixWon 21
L#1 DoublesKaren Chan / Laurence Woodard vs Shelly Janger / Mike Schlesinger4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesChristine Watson / Erik Marroquin vs Bita Nasseri / Todd Beiley6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKatherine Reed / Philip Brooks vs Beryl Mendelson / Seth Gottlieb6-3, 6-0
2026-07-18vs LA - LATC Mixed NutsLost 03
L#1 DoublesIris Cox / Tomas Romero vs Adam Cole-kelly / Esther Nordlinger2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesLea Taylor / Michael McMullin vs Candace Myung / Jesse Dang2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesTonya Crowe / Andrew Dillard vs Oliver Nordlinger / Jennifer Foley2-6, 4-6
2026-07-12vs LA - Marina Racquet ClubWon 21
L#1 DoublesHeidi Reed / Laurence Woodard vs Michael Martin / Anne Tlusty4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNorman Jones / Tonya Crowe vs Jonas Kant / Kathleen Dixon6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPhilip Brooks / Tsion Dawit vs Kelly Levy / Adam Weissman6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · LA - 7.0 Mixed Doubles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LA - Canyon Coyotes Mixed40111275
2LA - LATC Mixed Nuts411149113
3LA - Strings Attached318410105
4LA - Double Trouble 7.0326918133
5LA - Mooney Mates12451186
6LA - Marina Racquet Club0421021131
7LA - Tightly Strung Mix0531225169

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Erik Marroquin
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.64
Edward Wedding
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.58
Charlton Gillette
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Iris Cox
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.48
Philip Brooks
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Norman Jones
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.25
Tonya Crowe
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.19
Andrew Dillard
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.78
Lea Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.78
Tsion Dawit
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.73
Heidi Reed
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Karen Chan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Laurence Woodard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Michael McMullin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Tomas Romero
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tomas Romero + Iris Cox033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Erik Marroquin
20W–23L career · 7 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.74
Edward Wedding
2W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.64
4
Charlton Gillette
1W–3L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.58
Iris Cox
1W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.54
Philip Brooks
10W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
3.48
Norman Jones
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
85%15%<1%
3.35
Tonya Crowe
10W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
96%4%<1%
3.25
3.5
Andrew Dillard
2W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Lea Taylor
9W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Tsion Dawit
21W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Heidi Reed
9W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Karen Chan
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Laurence Woodard
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael McMullin
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tomas Romero
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.