Teams

LA - Strings Attached

2026 USTA MxD 40 & Over - LA · LA - 7.0 Mixed Doubles

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-29vs LA - Mooney MatesWon 30
W#1 DoublesJuan Pereira / Emily Pai vs Frank Kosa / Edith Chau6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKevin Rodriguez / Margie Englis vs Steaven Chen / Jacquelyn Chen6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesManuela Reyna / Christopher Lozinski vs Jay Puvvula / Renzo Anfossi6-1, 6-1
2026-08-22vs LA - Double Trouble 7.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesStephen Kim / Sarah Lim vs Lea Taylor / John Cox7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesChristopher Lozinski / Julie Rhee vs Tsion Dawit / Michael McMullin6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJuan Pereira / Lilit Khatchaturian vs Iris Cox / Tomas Romero6-2, 6-3
2026-08-08vs LA - Canyon Coyotes MixedLost 03
L#1 DoublesStephen Kim / Sarah Lim vs Michael Iguidez / Hoan Tiffany Lau4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesWilliam Pence / Margie Englis vs Rodrigo Retamoza / Celeste Torres4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPretesh Patel / Manuela Reyna vs Will Emery / Jessie Young3-6, 5-7
2026-08-01vs LA - Tightly Strung MixWon 30
W#1 DoublesKevin Rodriguez / Emily Pai vs Nadine Ellman / Dan Frysh6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesChristopher Lozinski / Julie Rhee vs Shelly Janger / peter johnson7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPretesh Patel / Manuela Reyna vs Mike Jensen / Kate Jensen6-4, 6-4
2026-07-25vs LA - LATC Mixed NutsWon 21
L#1 DoublesJustine Lassoff / William Pence vs William Callahan / Jennifer Foley4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMargie Englis / Pretesh Patel vs Alison Cole-kelly / Adam Cole-kelly4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChristopher Lozinski / Julie Rhee vs Jesse Dang / Gloria Chang7-5, 6-1
2026-07-18vs LA - Marina Racquet ClubWon 30
W#1 DoublesJustine Lassoff / William Pence vs Adam Weissman / Kelly Levy6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMargie Englis / Kevin Rodriguez vs Michael Martin / Anne Tlusty6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLilit Khatchaturian / Pretesh Patel vs Jason Choy / Amy Mucha6-3, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · LA - 7.0 Mixed Doubles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LA - Canyon Coyotes Mixed40111275
2LA - LATC Mixed Nuts411149113
3LA - Strings Attached318410105
4LA - Double Trouble 7.0326918133
5LA - Mooney Mates12451186
6LA - Marina Racquet Club0421021131
7LA - Tightly Strung Mix0531225169

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Juan Pereira
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.67
Manuela Reyna
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Stephen Kim
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.62
William Pence
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.42
Kevin Rodriguez
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.36
Margie Englis
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.33
Justine Lassoff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Lilit Khatchaturian
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.20
Julie Rhee
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.04
Christopher Lozinski
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.98
Emily Pai
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Pretesh Patel
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Justine Lassoff + Margie Englis314 matchesnot enough data
Justine Lassoff + Julie Rhee303 matchesnot enough data
Margie Englis + Manuela Reyna213 matchesnot enough data
Manuela Reyna + Pretesh Patel123 matchesnot enough data
Julie Rhee + Christopher Lozinski303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Juan Pereira
7W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Manuela Reyna
38W–27L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
3.67
Stephen Kim
11W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
3.65
William Pence
15W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.62
Kevin Rodriguez
30W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Margie Englis
169W–111L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
3.36
Justine Lassoff
24W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.33
3
Lilit Khatchaturian
74W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%4%96%
3.22
Julie Rhee
17W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
3
Christopher Lozinski
17W–5L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.04
3
Emily Pai
24W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Pretesh Patel
19W–10L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.83

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.