Teams

SDNC 3.5 Volley Vixens @La Costa/ Heartt

2023 SoCal Fall Doubles- SDNC- WD (Holiday) · SDNC - Women 3.5 Mon

12 players · average NTRP 3.58 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#2 DoublesErin Pasqualini / Kristy Toma-Tlalka vs Carrie Musicant / Ana Mariela Gamiz3-6, 4-6
2023-12-08vs SDNC 3.5 Kit Carson/ LyWon 10
W#1 DoublesAshlee Heartt / Heather Iantorno vs Katrina Lee / Vivian Thomas4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 DoublesErin Pasqualini / Stephanie Peters vs Salma Ott / Anastasia Duboshina4-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesAshlee Heartt / Andrea Goodwin vs Lynn Heiman / Beth Mattfolk6-2, 0-6, 0-1
2023-11-16vs SDNC 3.5 Jingle Girlz @RBS&T/ SweatSplit 11
W#1 DoublesHeather Iantorno / Ashlee Heartt vs Mary Jo Preti / Kathleen Kleinfeld6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesErin Pasqualini / Diana Blake vs Sandra Sweat / MONICA SYLVESTER3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Women 3.5 Mon have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Andrea Goodwin
published 4
3.77
Heather Iantorno
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Julie Gomez
published
3.51
Ashlee Heartt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Erin Pasqualini
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
Carrie Seranella
published 3.5
2.87
Gina Rivera
published 3
2.73
Kristy Toma-Tlalka
published
Janelle Anisso
published
Kerry McCullough
published
Laura Kieffer
published
Melanie Flaim
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashlee Heartt + Heather Iantorno9360% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrea Goodwin
24W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%41%59%
4.03
4
Heather Iantorno
44W–30L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
Julie Gomez
22W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%12%88%
3.66
3.5
Ashlee Heartt
25W–23L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Erin Pasqualini
56W–64L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
3.38
3.5
Carrie Seranella
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Gina Rivera
59W–80L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
2.87
Kristy Toma-Tlalka
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
Janelle Anisso
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kerry McCullough
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Laura Kieffer
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Melanie Flaim
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.