Teams

CLAREMONT R and S 40AW3.0B

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.0

16 players · average NTRP 2.80 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-01-18vs LANEY TA/DAVIE STADIUM 40AW3.0ALost 12
L#1 DoublesKatrine Shelton / Jina Lee vs Maria Debenedetti / Audrey Schroeder4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesDiane Heinze / Cindy Reid vs Cynthia Lim / Diane Simpson7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesRochelle Dineen / Shirley Rexrode vs Jean Kondo / Lana Rak1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.49 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.71
Suzanne Koga
published
2.70
Diane Heinze
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.67
Rebecca Shea
published
2.63
Carolyn Whittle
published 3
2.56
Katrine Shelton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.56
Shirley Rexrode
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.51
Vijaya Gadde
published
2.49
Carla Olynyk
published 3
2.48
Cindy Reid
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.40
Sally Baack
published
2.38
Jeri Jones
published
2.26
Monica Mehta
published
2.01
Atlantis Langowski
published 2.5
Marcia Valenstein
published
Rochelle Dineen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tina Raine-Bennett
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeri Jones + Sally Baack123 matchesnot enough data
Monica Mehta + Vijaya Gadde213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Suzanne Koga
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.71
2.5
Diane Heinze
10W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
0%6%94%
2.70
Rebecca Shea
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
10%90%1%
2.67
3
Carolyn Whittle
6W–11L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%<1%
2.63
Katrine Shelton
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
31%69%<1%
2.56
Shirley Rexrode
9W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
33%67%<1%
2.56
Vijaya Gadde
14W–7L career · no lines in 2025
0%46%54%
2.51
3
Carla Olynyk
2W–11L career · no lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.49
3
Cindy Reid
5W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.48
Sally Baack
12W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%79%21%
2.40
Jeri Jones
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%83%17%
2.38
Monica Mehta
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.26
2.5
Atlantis Langowski
5W–15L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.01
Marcia Valenstein
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rochelle Dineen
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Tina Raine-Bennett
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.