Teams

OC - Fullerton TC - Grom

2021 USTA Adult 55 & Over - OC · OC Women WE - 8.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.92 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-08-29vs OC - LLW Chapman - MaryLost 02
L#2 DoublesDeann McCormick / Lori Mahoney Jones vs Kim Graham / Karen Char3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBarbara Grom / Kathy Wilkinson vs Mary DeVlugt / Kieu-Nhi Nina Le1-6, 3-6
2021-08-28vs OC LPC - DiekneitLost 02
L#1 DoublesLori Mahoney Jones / Deann McCormick vs Paula Nishibayashi / Mary Thomas7-6, 3-4
L#2 DoublesYoko Ohigashi / Dee Harriman vs Elizabeth Frost / Mai Gu3-6, 2-6
2021-08-22vs OC LPC - DiekneitLost 02
L#2 DoublesLori Mahoney Jones / Kathy Wilkinson vs Sharon Diekneit / Paula Nishibayashi7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMary Goff / Jody Brennan vs Mary Thomas / Jennifer Heinly7-5, 1-1
2021-08-15vs OC - LLW Chapman - MaryLost 03
L#1 DoublesBarbara Grom / Jody Brennan vs Kim Graham / Karen Char2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDee Harriman / Mary Goff vs Kathleen Thurston / Laura Chasin3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesYoko Ohigashi / Kathy Wilkinson vs Kieu-Nhi Nina Le / Mary DeVlugt7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2021-07-17vs OC LPC - DiekneitSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKathy Wilkinson / Barbara Grom vs Mai Gu / Keiko Takahashi6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesYoko Ohigashi / Dee Harriman vs Sheri Hall / Cheryl Hirtler6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2021-07-03vs OC - LLW Chapman - MaryLost 03
L#1 DoublesLori Mahoney Jones / Deann McCormick vs Laura Chasin / Kathleen Thurston4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBarbara Wilson / Barbara Grom vs Karen Char / Kim Graham3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesNancy Kanter / Yoko Ohigashi vs Mary DeVlugt / Sharon Jimenez1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WE - 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Deann McCormick
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.68
Yoko Ohigashi
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.60
Lori Mahoney Jones
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.56
Jody Brennan
published
3.46
Nancy Kanter
published
3.42
Barbara Grom
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.40
Mary Goff
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.29
Dee Harriman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.14
Kathy Wilkinson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Goff + Dee Harriman4641% gamesnot enough data
Lori Mahoney Jones + Barbara Grom1836% gamesnot enough data
Deann McCormick + Barbara Grom1738% gamesnot enough data
Lori Mahoney Jones + Deann McCormick0532% gamesnot enough data
Barbara Grom + Yoko Ohigashi033 matchesnot enough data
Dee Harriman + Jody Brennan033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Deann McCormick
102W–101L career · 3 lines in 2021
53%47%<1%
3.99
4
Yoko Ohigashi
82W–87L career · 4 lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Lori Mahoney Jones
81W–124L career · 4 lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
3.60
Jody Brennan
9W–14L career · no lines in 2021
32%68%<1%
3.56
Nancy Kanter
1W–3L career · no lines in 2021
61%39%<1%
3.46
4
Barbara Grom
50W–144L career · 4 lines in 2021
74%26%<1%
3.42
3.5
Mary Goff
74W–44L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%78%21%
3.40
3.5
Dee Harriman
60W–62L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.29
Kathy Wilkinson
11W–17L career · no lines in 2021
14%85%<1%
3.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.