Teams

OC LPC - Diekneit

2021 USTA Adult 55 & Over - OC · OC Women WE - 8.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-09-04vs OC - LLW Chapman - MarySplit 11
W#1 DoublesPaula Nishibayashi / Keiko Takahashi vs Kathleen Thurston / Laura Chasin6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSharon Diekneit / Sheri Hall vs Beth Campbell / Anne Marie Risquez-Tomasyan3-6, 1-6
2021-08-28vs OC - Fullerton TC - GromSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPaula Nishibayashi / Mary Thomas vs Lori Mahoney Jones / Deann McCormick7-6, 3-4
L#3 DoublesJennifer Heinly / Cheryl Hirtler vs Debbie Kirk / Jody Brennan0-6, 3-6
2021-08-22vs OC - Fullerton TC - GromWon 10
W#2 DoublesSharon Diekneit / Paula Nishibayashi vs Lori Mahoney Jones / Kathy Wilkinson7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2021-08-14vs OC - LLW Chapman - MaryLost 01
L#3 DoublesPaula Nishibayashi / Sharon Diekneit vs Anne Marie Risquez-Tomasyan / Mary DeVlugt2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-07-24vs OC - LLW Chapman - MaryLost 02
L#1 DoublesCheryl Hirtler / Elizabeth Frost vs Beth Campbell / Cheryl Smith1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSharon Diekneit / Mary Thomas vs Kathleen Thurston / Laura Chasin2-6, 4-6
2021-07-17vs OC - Fullerton TC - GromLost 02
L#2 DoublesSharon Diekneit / Mary Thomas vs Debbie Kirk / Nancy Kanter2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSheri Hall / Cheryl Hirtler vs Yoko Ohigashi / Dee Harriman2-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WE - 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Mary Thomas
published
3.57
Paula Nishibayashi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.53
Mai Gu
published
3.52
Cheryl Hirtler
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.30
Sharon Diekneit
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.15
Elizabeth Frost
published 3.5
Sheri Hall
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sharon Diekneit + Paula Nishibayashi134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Thomas
3W–1L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Paula Nishibayashi
92W–73L career · 4 lines in 2021
29%71%<1%
3.57
Mai Gu
13W–16L career · no lines in 2021
41%59%<1%
3.53
4
Cheryl Hirtler
27W–79L career · 3 lines in 2021
44%56%<1%
3.52
3.5
Sharon Diekneit
186W–204L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Elizabeth Frost
1W–3L career · no lines in 2021
12%87%<1%
3.15
Sheri Hall
3W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.