Teams

Westside - Gladiators

2023 HTA Spring NA - Mixed Doubles Sunday · 8.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.88 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-03-26Won 10
W#4 DoublesRoger Chumbley / Marissa Valentine-King vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-03-19vs MPTC - X-ForceLost 01
L#2 DoublesAdama Traore / Marissa Valentine-King vs Jacob Jensen / Karen Jensen4-6, 3-6
2023-03-05vs AD IN - VolleyersWon 10
W#2 DoublesMarissa Valentine-King / John Garcia vs Hannah Law / Leon Law6-2, 6-1
2023-02-12Won 10
W#4 DoublesMarissa Valentine-King / Simon Sierra vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-01-29vs AD IN - Deuces WildWon 10
W#2 DoublesMarissa Valentine-King / Adama Traore vs Leyla Martinez / Julian Vela6-0, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.65
Marissa Valentine-King
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #4 Doubles 40% · published
4.14
Tara Kim
published
4.10
4.01
Yi Zhou
published
3.90
Yu Liang
published
3.87
Mark Etienne
published
3.78
Lavaughn Sims
published
3.77
Julia Gast
published
Alexandra Molano
published 4
Annie Cahill
published 4
3.53
William Rucker
published
3.41
Simon Sierra
published
3.29
Adama Traore
published 3.5
Katie Keig
published
Matthew Nafziger
published
Roger Chumbley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Annie Cahill + Mark Etienne7458% games+5.3% vs expected
Yi Zhou + Yu Liang152052% games−4.6% vs expected
Matthew Nafziger + Julia Gast2351% gamesnot enough data
William Rucker + Katie Keig213 matchesnot enough data
Christopher Cucchiara + Julia Gast303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marissa Valentine-King
167W–64L career · 5 lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
4.65
Tara Kim
34W–15L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%<1%
4.14
4
Christopher Cucchiara
78W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%23%77%
4.10
Yi Zhou
44W–31L career · no lines in 2023
<1%45%55%
4.01
Yu Liang
48W–38L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.90
Mark Etienne
48W–31L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
3.87
Lavaughn Sims
27W–20L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%5%
3.78
Julia Gast
86W–46L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Alexandra Molano
2W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Annie Cahill
14W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
William Rucker
22W–10L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.53
Simon Sierra
29W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Adama Traore
66W–64L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.29
Katie Keig
10W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Matthew Nafziger
16W–22L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Roger Chumbley
10W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.