Teams

UPTA50S/Friedman/Kroc

2025 UPTA Singles 50 & Over - SC · 50+ Singles Men - 4.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.67 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-15vs UPTA50S/Meredith/ACACLost 02
L#1 SinglesBrian Dabney vs Grant Hunter0-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesScott Dickey vs Richard Babcock5-7, 4-6
2025-11-01vs UPTA50S/Gibson/KrocLost 02
L#2 SinglesRobert Florian vs Douglas Meagher0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesScott Dickey vs Clay Custer0-6, 2-6
2025-10-25vs UPTA50S/Meredith/ACACLost 03
L#1 SinglesAndrew Fogel vs Grant Hunter0-5
L#2 SinglesScott Dickey vs Rick Conard1-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesRick McWhorter vs Richard Babcock1-6, 0-6
2025-10-11vs UPTA50S/Gibson/KrocLost 12
L#1 SinglesBrian Dabney vs Kit Johnson2-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesAndrew Fogel vs Fred Guthier6-4, 6-4
L#3 SinglesRobert Florian vs Chris Helms1-6, 1-6
2025-10-04vs UPTA50S/Meredith/ACACLost 02
L#2 SinglesBrian Dabney vs Rick Conard1-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesDennis Gillan vs Richard Babcock6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2025-09-20vs UPTA50S/Gibson/KrocLost 02
L#2 SinglesAndrew Fogel vs Clay Custer0-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesRick McWhorter vs Chris Helms2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 50+ Singles Men - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Andrew Fogel
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.38
Dennis Gillan
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Rick McWhorter
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.12
Brian Dabney
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Scott Dickey
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.99
Robert Florian
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
Don Zehr
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rick McWhorter + Dennis Gillan033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrew Fogel
1W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Dennis Gillan
13W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.38
Rick McWhorter
3W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Brian Dabney
1W–22L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.12
Scott Dickey
8W–50L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.10
Robert Florian
0W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.99
Don Zehr
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.