Teams

UPTA50S/Meredith/ACAC

2025 UPTA Singles 50 & Over - SC · 50+ Singles Men - 4.0

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-15vs UPTA50S/Friedman/KrocWon 30
W#1 SinglesGrant Hunter vs Brian Dabney6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesRick Conard vs Brian Friedman6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesRichard Babcock vs Scott Dickey7-5, 6-4
2025-11-08vs UPTA50S/Gibson/KrocWon 30
W#1 SinglesBrad Meredith vs Fred Guthier6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesFrank Powell vs Kit Johnson6-2, 6-3
W#3 SinglesHarvinder Sidhu vs Brian Green6-3, 6-4
2025-10-25vs UPTA50S/Friedman/KrocWon 30
W#1 SinglesGrant Hunter vs Andrew Fogel5-0
W#2 SinglesRick Conard vs Scott Dickey6-1, 6-3
W#3 SinglesRichard Babcock vs Rick McWhorter6-1, 6-0
2025-10-18vs UPTA50S/Gibson/KrocLost 12
L#1 SinglesFrank Powell vs Douglas Meagher2-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesHarvinder Sidhu vs John Gibson6-1, 6-0
L#3 SinglesRick Conard vs Kit Johnson0-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-10-04vs UPTA50S/Friedman/KrocWon 30
W#1 SinglesHarvinder Sidhu vs Brian Friedman6-3, 6-0
W#2 SinglesRick Conard vs Brian Dabney6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesRichard Babcock vs Dennis Gillan3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-09-27vs UPTA50S/Gibson/KrocWon 21
W#1 SinglesFrank Powell vs John Gibson7-5, 6-4
W#2 SinglesRick Conard vs David Merline6-3, 3-4
L#3 SinglesHarvinder Sidhu vs Clay Custer0-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 50+ Singles Men - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Frank Powell
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.70
Grant Hunter
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.53
Harvinder Sidhu
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.51
Rick Conard
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #3 Singles 20% · published
3.45
Richard Babcock
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.27
Brad Meredith
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Harvinder Sidhu + Brad Meredith6260% games+19.9% vs expected
Harvinder Sidhu + Richard Babcock224 matchesnot enough data
Harvinder Sidhu + Frank Powell213 matchesnot enough data
Richard Babcock + Rick Conard123 matchesnot enough data
Richard Babcock + Grant Hunter123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Frank Powell
54W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.71
Grant Hunter
29W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Harvinder Sidhu
48W–41L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.53
Rick Conard
17W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.51
Richard Babcock
14W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
3.45
3.5
Brad Meredith
58W–37L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.