Teams

Team 5 Smart Aces

2023 NOVA Mixed 40 & Over · NOVA Mixed 40 & Over 7.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.60 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-06-04vs Team 8Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCheryl Danner / Jason Olson vs Raman Batish / Sibyll Jones2-6, 7-5
2023-05-13vs Team 1 High RollersLost 02
L#2 DoublesCheryl Danner / Terry Saeger vs Sharon Sabasteanski / Anthony Chang5-7, 3-5
L#3 DoublesJeffrey Schreibman / Joanne Good vs David Todd / Tara Jefferson1-6, 1-6
2023-04-26vs Team 6 PiF 40+Split 11
L#1 DoublesTerry Saeger / Joanne Good vs Stephen Gotts / Blanca Shumann3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJacob Sultan / Cheryl Danner vs VI Huynh / Angela Boone6-1, 6-6
2023-04-16vs Team 4Won 10
W#1 DoublesCheryl Danner / Timothy DeCamp vs Errin Matechak / SHANE MURRAY6-3, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Mixed 40 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Elizabeth Young
published
3.57
Ashley Lee
published 4
3.38
Cheryl Danner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.36
Jeffrey Schreibman
published
3.36
Eric Hopkins
published 3.5
3.34
Timothy DeCamp
published
3.27
Joanne Good
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.15
Kristi Nault
published
3.00
Terry Saeger
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
JR Carreras
published
Jacob Sultan
published
Jason Olson
published
Perry Zettersten
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth Young
36W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%24%76%
3.60
4
Ashley Lee
9W–1L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
Cheryl Danner
137W–193L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.38
Jeffrey Schreibman
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%16%
3.36
3.5
Eric Hopkins
10W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%15%
3.36
Timothy DeCamp
26W–30L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Joanne Good
85W–87L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Kristi Nault
16W–13L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Terry Saeger
77W–96L career · 2 lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
3.00
JR Carreras
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jacob Sultan
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jason Olson
31W–30L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Perry Zettersten
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.