Teams

Spring Park/Bradley W4.0T

2026 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Thursday League

18 players · average NTRP 3.92 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-25Lost 01
L#1 SinglesKristl Pearl vs Sarah Manning5-7, 1-6
2026-06-18vs Greenhill/Newberg-Schonwald W4.0TSplit 11
L#1 SinglesKristl Pearl vs Christina Manfredi2-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMichelle Hefner / Bonnie Shea vs Ginger Newberg / Mary Helen Nine6-3, 7-5
2026-06-11Won 10
W#1 SinglesKristl Pearl vs Nicole Ashton6-3, 6-4
2026-06-04Lost 01
L#1 SinglesKristl Pearl vs Amelia White4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-05-28vs DCC/Crouch-Lee W4.0TLost 01
L#2 DoublesBonnie Shea / Stacey Zartler vs Holly Lawrence / Susan Thompson6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2026-05-14Won 10
W#2 SinglesKristl Pearl vs Allison Waldron6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2026-05-07vs Northwood/Calvert W4.0TWon 10
W#3 DoublesBonnie Shea / Teri Wilson vs Missy Rothwell / Aimee Trumpower2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-05-01vs Gleneagles/Shukis-Wright W4.0TLost 01
L#2 SinglesKristl Pearl vs Irina Nicely4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for S W. Thursday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Natalie Clarkson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.86
Renee Aaron
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
3.84
Lisa Buitron
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.76
April Murphy
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.69
Bonnie Shea
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Kristl Pearl
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.66
Erin Nolen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.64
Danielle White
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.62
Teri Wilson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.59
Shannon Craig
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
MARY DAMKROGER
usually #1 Singles 46%, also #2 Singles 27% · published
3.57
Michelle Hefner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
3.55
Elaine Payne
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.53
Stacey Zartler
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.38
Kimberly DiNota
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.38
Amber Morefield
usually #2 Singles 44%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 3.5
3.21
Lisa Ragle
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.21
Sarah Southcott
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #2 Singles 38% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Teri Wilson + Stacey Zartler17368% games+5.9% vs expected
Michelle Hefner + Elaine Payne4253% games+0.9% vs expected
Kimberly DiNota + MARY DAMKROGER7359% games+0.3% vs expected
Amber Morefield + Lisa Buitron5550% games−1.1% vs expected
Michelle Hefner + Kristl Pearl7354% games−1.2% vs expected
Teri Wilson + Kimberly DiNota3244% gamesnot enough data
Renee Aaron + Natalie Clarkson224 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Hefner + Natalie Clarkson224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natalie Clarkson
21W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.94
Renee Aaron
48W–27L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%85%14%
3.86
Lisa Buitron
19W–18L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
April Murphy
9W–17L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
3.76
4
Bonnie Shea
12W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.69
Kristl Pearl
17W–14L career · 6 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Erin Nolen
6W–7L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
3.66
4
Danielle White
18W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
3.64
Teri Wilson
43W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.62
Shannon Craig
11W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.59
MARY DAMKROGER
40W–19L career · 11 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.58
Michelle Hefner
30W–40L career · 10 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.57
4
Elaine Payne
15W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
Stacey Zartler
26W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.53
Kimberly DiNota
32W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Amber Morefield
35W–31L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.38
Lisa Ragle
5W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026
99%1%<1%
3.21
Sarah Southcott
26W–32L career · 8 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.21

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.