Teams

SSC TM II

2025 Sarasota Social TriMix Fall · North County 8.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.61 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-11-26vs LWR AndersonLost 01
L#1 Mixed DoublesSandra Poston / Gustavo Risquez vs Marc Rosenthal / Christie Boylston2-6, 0-6
2025-11-16vs University Park CarrettaSplit 11
W#2 Mixed DoublesJoe Malave / Natalie Bloch vs Paul Clark / Claudia Clark6-3, 6-1
L#3 Mixed DoublesMonica Barth / Alan Switzman vs Mark Moore / Cecile Wooster4-6, 5-7
2025-11-09vs Payne Park Playing the FieldLost 02
L#2 Mixed DoublesGregory Childers / Viviane Dainesi vs Todd Reuter / Susan Rakay2-6, 3-6
L#3 Mixed DoublesAlan Switzman / Lorraine Forzani vs Bruce King / Cassandra McPike5-7, 4-6
2025-11-02vs LWN BearsLost 01
L#3 Mixed DoublesJoe Malave / Monica Barth vs Cuong Truong / Leila Romano4-6, 3-6
2025-10-26vs SSC Ross TriMix 1Won 10
W#3 Mixed DoublesGustavo Risquez / Lorraine Forzani vs SCOTT HOWARD / Pam Howard6-2, 6-2
2025-10-19vs LWR AndersonLost 03
L#1 Mixed DoublesThiago Domingues / Monica Barth vs Marc Rosenthal / Christie Boylston2-6, 1-6
L#2 Mixed DoublesJoe Malave / Natalie Bloch vs Luke Anderson / Christine Handel1-6, 3-6
L#3 Mixed DoublesJon Miller / Jennifer Olliges vs Bob Abraham / Kassandra Hugill6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-10-12vs University Park CarrettaWon 21
W#1 Mixed DoublesThiago Domingues / Monica Barth vs Hanford Gross / Gabriella Vayshelboym6-2, 6-2
W#2 Mixed DoublesJoe Malave / Sarah Anne Mcdonald vs Mark Moore / Cecile Wooster6-2, 6-4
L#3 Mixed DoublesWade McDonald / Jennifer Olliges vs David Ryland / Gwen Gozigian1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-10-05vs Payne Park Playing the FieldWon 20
W#1 Mixed DoublesThiago Domingues / Viviane Dainesi vs James Getzen / Melissa Caldwell6-3, 6-4
W#3 Mixed DoublesJoe Malave / Sandra Poston vs Scott Stevens / Mary Swain7-5, 6-3
2025-09-28vs LWN BearsWon 30
W#1 Mixed DoublesThiago Domingues / Viviane Dainesi vs John Anderson / Michele Anderson6-4, 7-6
W#2 Mixed DoublesSkip Rowe / Nicole Thompson vs Steve Bautista / Ana Bautista7-6, 6-4
W#3 Mixed DoublesJon Miller / Lorraine Forzani vs Mike Bontell / Nichole Bontell6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for North County 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Sarah Anne Mcdonald
published
3.87
Natalie Bloch
usually #2 Mixed Doubles 100% · published 4
3.85
Gregory Childers
published 4
3.80
Nicole Thompson
published
3.78
Gustavo Risquez
usually #3 Mixed Doubles 50%, also #1 Mixed Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Wade McDonald
published
3.63
Joe Malave
usually #2 Mixed Doubles 60%, also #3 Mixed Doubles 40% · published 4
3.51
Monica Barth
usually #1 Mixed Doubles 50%, also #3 Mixed Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.41
Sandra Poston
published
3.34
Alan Switzman
published 3.5
3.20
Trisha Moslin
published
3.17
Viviane Dainesi
usually #1 Mixed Doubles 67%, also #2 Mixed Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Skip Rowe
usually #2 Mixed Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Jennifer Olliges
usually #3 Mixed Doubles 100% · published 3
2.98
Lorraine Forzani
usually #3 Mixed Doubles 100% · published 3
Thiago Domingues
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lorraine Forzani + Monica Barth4257% gamesnot enough data
Lorraine Forzani + Jennifer Olliges4255% gamesnot enough data
Lorraine Forzani + Viviane Dainesi3251% gamesnot enough data
Gustavo Risquez + Joe Malave123 matchesnot enough data
Monica Barth + Jennifer Olliges303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Anne Mcdonald
63W–40L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
3.93
4
Natalie Bloch
57W–54L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.87
4
Gregory Childers
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.85
Nicole Thompson
20W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.80
4
Gustavo Risquez
206W–175L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.78
Wade McDonald
30W–41L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Joe Malave
127W–103L career · 5 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.63
3.5
Monica Barth
130W–57L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.51
Sandra Poston
48W–39L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
3.41
Melissa Grossenkemper
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Alan Switzman
0W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Trisha Moslin
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Viviane Dainesi
69W–48L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
Skip Rowe
20W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
11%89%<1%
3.16
3
Jennifer Olliges
30W–33L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Lorraine Forzani
67W–52L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
Thiago Domingues
8W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.