Teams

Racquettes

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - BOISE · TV

16 players · average NTRP 3.75 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-07-08vs Chic KickersWon 30
W#1 SinglesSherri Felton vs Shanell Finley6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesChristine Elwer / Grace Elwer vs ADRA KIPPER / Merritt Swartley6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAmanda Steele / Rochelle Martin vs Jill Yost / Roxana Heisler3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-06-29vs WhaquedWon 20
W#2 SinglesSherri Felton vs Vanessa Schulte6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesVicki Osweiler / Grace Elwer vs Rosemarie Berhan / Nancy Nelson6-0, 6-1
2021-06-24vs Deja DeuceSplit 11
W#2 DoublesGrace Elwer / Evelyn Elwer vs Kara Rasmussen / Heidi Hawkins6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAngel Marie Bowie / Rochelle Martin vs Jacqueline Hickman / Christine Cegelski2-6, 3-6
2021-06-22vs Supreme CourtWon 20
W#2 SinglesSherri Felton vs Heidi Minegar6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRochelle Martin / Angel Marie Bowie vs Saundra Coronado / Jennifer Visser6-4, 6-3
2021-06-08vs Ace BandagesWon 10
W#3 DoublesAmanda Steele / Rochelle Martin vs Marnie Newton / Barbara Tesnohlidek7-5, 7-5
2021-05-25Won 20
W#2 DoublesChristine Elwer / Grace Elwer vs Carol Mills / Suzanne Hickok6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAngel Marie Bowie / Vicki Osweiler vs Gracie Franks / Robin Toney6-0, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Evelyn Elwer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Grace Elwer
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.73
Kimberly Cowley
published 4
3.59
Christine Elwer
published 4
3.59
3.30
Nancy Mallory
published 3.5
Amanda Steele
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Shannon Lofton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
3.04
Angel Marie Bowie
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.03
Monica Reagan
published
2.83
Jamie Hammond
published 3
Lori van Alfen
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Rochelle Martin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sherri Felton
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Vicki Osweiler
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katheryn Burriesci + Kimberly Cowley7650% games+9.1% vs expected
Nancy Mallory + Katheryn Burriesci6450% games+0.5% vs expected
Christine Elwer + Katheryn Burriesci15458% games−0.2% vs expected
Kimberly Cowley + Colette van de Graaff7553% games−2.7% vs expected
Kimberly Cowley + Lori van Alfen503254% gamesnot enough data
Vicki Osweiler + Angel Marie Bowie121349% gamesnot enough data
Katheryn Burriesci + Lori van Alfen12456% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Mallory + Kimberly Cowley9554% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Colette van de Graaff
74W–48L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Evelyn Elwer
20W–4L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
4
Grace Elwer
8W–4L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Kimberly Cowley
140W–95L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Christine Elwer
156W–133L career · no lines in 2021
23%76%<1%
3.59
4
Katheryn Burriesci
108W–95L career · no lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
3.59
3.5
Nancy Mallory
189W–137L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Amanda Steele
65W–129L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Shannon Lofton
34W–38L career · 10 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Angel Marie Bowie
61W–93L career · 3 lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
3.04
Monica Reagan
106W–95L career · no lines in 2021
42%58%<1%
3.03
3
Jamie Hammond
31W–57L career · no lines in 2021
<1%89%10%
2.83
Lori van Alfen
51W–35L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Rochelle Martin
13W–14L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Sherri Felton
46W–68L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Vicki Osweiler
53W–66L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.