Teams

Park City MARC-Llewellyn/Sahlman

2024 Fall Outdoor League-Weekday · 2.5W

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-10-14vs Ivory Ridge-Mullins/KarrasWon 20
W#1 SinglesKim Li vs Risa Karras6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRachel Sahlman / Megan Johnstone vs Paulette Santiago / Cara Larson6-2, 6-2
2024-10-07vs Red Ledges-EganWon 20
W#1 SinglesJulie Banov vs McCall Weekes6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMegan Johnstone / Kim Li vs Susan Anderson / Marina Perkins6-3, 6-2
2024-09-30vs Sports Mall-NelsonWon 10
W#2 DoublesKim Li / Megan Johnstone vs Kiely Hanks / Kimberly Flamm6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2024-09-23Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMegan Johnstone / Kim Li vs Rachelle Lee / Stephanie Webb2-6, 1-6
2024-09-16vs Liberty Park Tennis-JacksonWon 10
W#2 DoublesMegan Johnstone / Jennifer Robert vs Emily Scalley / Sarah Whisenant6-1, 6-3
2024-09-09vs Ivory Ridge-Mullins/KarrasWon 20
W#1 SinglesKim Li vs Paulette Santiago3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMegan Johnstone / Rachel Sahlman vs Mysha Bolen / Megan Mullins2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-08-26vs Red Ledges-EganLost 01
L#1 SinglesMegan Johnstone vs Morgan Adams2-6, 2-6
2024-08-19Lost 01
L#1 SinglesJennifer Robert vs Sarah Gardner1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 2.5W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Cottonwood Club-Barber/Krejci7116820176
2Park City MARC-Llewellyn/Sahlman6217719181
3Wasatch Rec Center-Kelly/Nielsen62141023193
4Park City MARC-Jacobs44111328230
5Liberty Park Tennis-Jackson34111024197
6Sunpro-Allen35121229231
7The Serve-Vivors-Russell/Betteridge26101433225
8Ivory Ridge-Mullins/Karras2661838248

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.78
Bridget Llewellyn
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #4 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.65
Megan Johnstone
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #1 Singles 14% · published
2.65
Kim Li
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.63
Dania Lees
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Margaret Bloomer
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.48
Rachel Sahlman
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #4 Doubles 27% · published 3
2.38
Jennifer Robert
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Julie Banov
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dania Lees + Megan Johnstone10359% games+13.0% vs expected
Margaret Bloomer + Dania Lees4647% games+5.8% vs expected
Bridget Llewellyn + Rachel Sahlman6753% games+4.6% vs expected
Margaret Bloomer + Bridget Llewellyn191752% games+4.5% vs expected
Kim Li + Megan Johnstone9651% games+2.1% vs expected
Margaret Bloomer + Rachel Sahlman4453% games−5.0% vs expected
Bridget Llewellyn + Dania Lees4352% games−5.7% vs expected
Rachel Sahlman + Megan Johnstone7748% games−6.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Bridget Llewellyn
54W–54L career · 10 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
Megan Johnstone
32W–30L career · 7 lines in 2024
14%85%1%
2.65
Kim Li
15W–10L career · 5 lines in 2024
14%85%1%
2.65
3
Dania Lees
28W–25L career · 1 line in 2024
17%82%<1%
2.63
3
Margaret Bloomer
37W–42L career · 8 lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
2.60
3
Rachel Sahlman
24W–34L career · type A · 11 lines in 2024
57%43%<1%
2.48
Jennifer Robert
6W–19L career · 2 lines in 2024
81%19%<1%
2.38
Julie Banov
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.