Teams

NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 40AW3.0B

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.0

18 players · average NTRP 2.94 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Brie Cadman
published 3.5
3.21
Yukie Toyama
published
2.94
Kristen Kincaid
published
2.92
Celia Welch
published 3
2.92
Sharon Wippern
published
2.89
Sarah Marriott
published
2.85
Melissa Hahn
published
2.79
Colleen Winters
published 3
2.75
Lindsay DeRose
published
Colette Gell
published 3
2.63
Nancy Tarantino
published
2.59
2.46
Dorothee Ring
published
2.42
Barbara Lum
published 3
2.41
Catherine Hoffman
published 2.5
2.20
ALLISON WHITLOCK
published 2.5
2.12
Kimberly Butts
published
Teresa Levin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristen Kincaid + Yukie Toyama6160% games+6.3% vs expected
Colleen Winters + Celia Welch4261% gamesnot enough data
Kristen Kincaid + Sharon Wippern303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brie Cadman
14W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
Yukie Toyama
17W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.21
Kristen Kincaid
15W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Celia Welch
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.92
Sharon Wippern
16W–22L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.92
Sarah Marriott
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89
Melissa Hahn
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Colleen Winters
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Lindsay DeRose
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.75
3
Colette Gell
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Tarantino
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.63
3
Alexandra Lorraine
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
2.59
Dorothee Ring
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.46
3
Barbara Lum
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
72%28%<1%
2.42
2.5
Catherine Hoffman
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
0%74%26%
2.41
2.5
ALLISON WHITLOCK
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.20
Kimberly Butts
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Teresa Levin
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.