Teams

5-TLangino-SVC

2024 Eno River Fall Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over 4.0 Women Evening

6 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-11-26vs 7-ALacoff-HVCCLost 01
L#2 SinglesEve Hammett vs Amanda Lacoff2-6, 2-6
2024-11-13vs 6-MLong-ENOLost 12
L#1 SinglesTiffany Langino vs Kim Peters4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesEve Hammett vs Elizabeth Chan0-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesChristine Sudzina Schut vs Celina Morice7-5, 6-2
2024-10-30vs 4-JHoward-ENOWon 30
W#1 SinglesTiffany Langino vs Janelle Howard6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesEve Hammett vs Berna Tareen6-4, 6-4
W#3 SinglesChristine Sudzina Schut vs Mary Jo Dunnington6-4, 6-1
2024-10-23vs 1-CYu-ENOWon 20
W#1 SinglesTiffany Langino vs Caroline Yu6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesEve Hammett vs Lina Habib4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-10-16vs 2-BShane-ENOLost 02
L#1 SinglesTiffany Langino vs Sindhu Shivaji2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesEve Hammett vs Button Hall2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 4.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Tiffany Langino
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.58
Erika Linnander
published
3.54
Eve Hammett
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Christine Sudzina Schut
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Melissa Coward
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.28
Katie Naftel
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christine Sudzina Schut + Tiffany Langino8262% games+11.5% vs expected
Christine Sudzina Schut + Melissa Coward13559% games+1.1% vs expected
Eve Hammett + Tiffany Langino452955% games−1.7% vs expected
Tiffany Langino + Melissa Coward4354% gamesnot enough data
Katie Naftel + Christine Sudzina Schut5158% gamesnot enough data
Katie Naftel + Melissa Coward3350% gamesnot enough data
Katie Naftel + Eve Hammett4162% gamesnot enough data
Eve Hammett + Melissa Coward314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tiffany Langino
244W–125L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%88%12%
3.83
Erika Linnander
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
27%72%<1%
3.58
3.5
Eve Hammett
132W–82L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%39%61%
3.54
3.5
Christine Sudzina Schut
149W–88L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
3.42
3.5
Melissa Coward
146W–74L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Katie Naftel
57W–53L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.