Teams

LLW-CV-Mission Hills/Polisky

2023 USTA Adult 55 & Over - CV · CV Women 9.0

7 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-03-20vs CV-Indian Wells TG/Fleming & BullsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Kuhle / Elyse Rabinowitz vs Renee Marrotte / Kathleen Bradley6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesColleen Scanlon / Vickki Schlappi vs Anne Medzegian / Brenda Williams3-6, 4-6
2023-03-10Won 10
W#1 DoublesJulie David / Elizabeth Kuhle vs Karen Ames / Linda Fleiderman6-2, 6-1
2023-03-06vs CV-Indian Wells TG/Fleming & BullsSplit 11
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Kuhle / Lis Andrade vs Anne Medzegian / Brenda Williams2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesVickki Schlappi / Andrea Polisky vs Cheryl Thoresen / Renee Marrotte7-6, 6-2
2023-02-27Split 11
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Kuhle / Elyse Rabinowitz vs Brenda Williams / Kristin Smith6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTammy Peltzer / Vickki Schlappi vs Christa Cameron / Michelle Hall3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-02-20Won 10
W#3 DoublesVickki Schlappi / Colleen Scanlon vs Shaughne Warnack / Linda Fleiderman6-2, 6-2
2023-02-13Won 10
W#1 DoublesElyse Rabinowitz / Elizabeth Kuhle vs Anne Medzegian / Tricia Hanley6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.26 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.55
Nancy Daly
published 5
4.39
Colleen Scanlon
published 4.5
4.07
Elizabeth Kuhle
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
4.01
Vickki Schlappi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Andrea Polisky
published 4
Gail Warden
published
Margaret Shepp
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gail Warden + Margaret Shepp303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Nancy Daly
22W–18L career · type S · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.55
4.5
Colleen Scanlon
16W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%21%
4.39
Elizabeth Kuhle
77W–27L career · 5 lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
4.07
4.5
Vickki Schlappi
67W–40L career · 4 lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
4.01
4
Andrea Polisky
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Gail Warden
8W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Margaret Shepp
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.