Teams

NIN FW MXD 18&O 6.0: White

NIN FW Mixed 18 & Over · NIN FW MXD 18&0 6.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHERN INDIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-04-18vs NIN FW MXD 18&O 6.0: ValcarcelWon 10
W#3 DoublesKendell Feaker / Mark Rifkin vs Rachel Mattiuz / Brendon Mattiuz6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2026-03-21Won 10
W#2 DoublesMark Rifkin / Sea Grandon vs Amy Wills / Charles Ji6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2026-02-14Won 10
W#1 DoublesDinesh Agnihotri / Preeti Dembla vs Brian Hart / Carol Kamin6-2, 6-3
2026-02-07vs NIN FW MXD 18&O 6.0: ValcarcelWon 10
W#2 DoublesApril Cohen / Greg Salway vs Rachel Mattiuz / Brendon Mattiuz6-4, 6-2
2026-02-01vs NIN FW MXD 18&O 6.0: LeLost 01
L#3 DoublesDinesh Agnihotri / Preeti Dembla vs Charles Vu / Alison Lee3-6, 1-6
2026-01-24vs NIN FW MXD 18&O 6.0: ValcarcelWon 10
W#2 DoublesGreg Salway / Kendell Feaker vs John Ducker / Johanna Ducker7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2026-01-16Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKendell Feaker / Brent Davis vs Brian Hart / Cindy Volk2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesIgor Nikitin / Sea Grandon vs GEORGE JOHN / Amy Wills2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · NIN FW MXD 18&0 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NIN FW MXD 18&O 6.0: White5315924207
2NIN FW MXD 18&O 6.0: Valcarcel44111329227
3NIN FW MXD 18&O 6.0: Le35101431242

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Mark Rifkin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.01
Dinesh Agnihotri
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.91
Kendell Feaker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.87
Greg Salway
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
April Cohen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Igor Nikitin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Preeti Dembla
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Roshan Kotian
published
Steve White
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Preeti Dembla + Steve White3354% gamesnot enough data
Dinesh Agnihotri + Preeti Dembla134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mark Rifkin
41W–36L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.13
Dinesh Agnihotri
47W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.01
Kendell Feaker
15W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
2.91
Greg Salway
54W–88L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.87
3
April Cohen
55W–55L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Igor Nikitin
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%3%
2.75
Preeti Dembla
49W–96L career · 2 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
Roshan Kotian
2W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Steve White
305W–144L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.