Teams

McKinney/Mutter W7.0

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 65 & Over ADULT Friday · W7.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.33 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-05-09vs SpringPark/Dwiggins-Martinez W7.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJeannette Keton / Anna Gortana vs Melissa Hill / Mary Martinez0-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJoan Thorne / Doreen McDonnell vs Mary Ann Walters / Teri Wilson1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesClaudia Laferney / Zarlita Wright vs Betty Evans / Cindy Neyland1-6, 2-6
2025-04-02vs SpringPark/Dwiggins-Martinez W7.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesAnna Gortana / Cynthia Brugge vs Julie Bradley / Judy Archbold1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Hansen / Zarlita Wright vs Jill Kennedy / Cindy Neyland4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesJoan Thorne / Doreen McDonnell vs Mary Ann Walters / Mary Dwiggins2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for W7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Claudia Laferney
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Cynthia Brugge
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.88
Joan Thorne
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.78
Anna Gortana
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.61
Doreen McDonnell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.61
Zarlita Wright
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jeannette Keton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
June Ricks
published
Terry Mutter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Doreen McDonnell + Joan Thorne134 matchesnot enough data
Joan Thorne + Zarlita Wright044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Claudia Laferney
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Cynthia Brugge
0W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Joan Thorne
12W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Anna Gortana
4W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Doreen McDonnell
5W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.61
Zarlita Wright
3W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.61
Jeannette Keton
3W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
June Ricks
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Terry Mutter
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.