Teams

SpringPark/Dwiggins-Martinez W7.0

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 65 & Over ADULT Friday · W7.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-05-23vs High Point/Becker W7.0Split 11
W#1 DoublesMary Ann Walters / Debra Driscoll vs Phyllis Charles / Stephanie Bice6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCindy Neyland / Margaret Cooley vs Donna Bickerstaff / Debbie James7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-05-16vs High Point/Ferrell W7.0Won 20
W#2 DoublesDebra Driscoll / Nancy Lacey vs Lisa Stolakis / Kathy Cook6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMary Dwiggins / Teri Wilson vs Barbara Shlesinger / Evelyn Werbaneth6-1, 6-1
2025-05-09vs McKinney/Mutter W7.0Won 20
W#2 DoublesMary Ann Walters / Teri Wilson vs Joan Thorne / Doreen McDonnell6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBetty Evans / Cindy Neyland vs Claudia Laferney / Zarlita Wright6-1, 6-2
2025-05-02vs LifeTime Plano/Freshwater W7.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesMary Ann Walters / Jill Kennedy vs Barb O'Rear / Suvanee Chirachanchai4-6
W#2 DoublesDebra Driscoll / Charlotte Ereckson vs Stacy Tackaberry / Erin Treloar6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTeri Wilson / Betty Evans vs Carol Carr / Connie Schavrien6-4, 6-1
2025-04-25vs High Point/Carson-Blocker W7.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesMary Ann Walters / Margaret Cooley vs Margaret Bronsweig / Renee Simpson6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJill Kennedy / Mary Dwiggins vs Miki Carson / Toni Harrigan6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesCharlotte Ereckson / Betty Evans vs Kathy Battad / Nan Morrow4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-04-18vs High Point/Ferrell W7.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesMary Ann Walters / Jill Kennedy vs Judi Robeson / C Yvonne Chambers2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesBetty Evans / Cindy Neyland vs Pamela Ferrell / Evelyn Werbaneth6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCharlotte Ereckson / Debra Driscoll vs Anne Wickes / Barbara Shlesinger6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2025-04-11vs High Point/Becker W7.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesMary Ann Walters / Debra Driscoll vs Debbie James / Julie Altenau6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMargaret Cooley / Jill Kennedy vs Stephanie Bice / Jackie Coburn6-0, 7-6
L#3 DoublesMary Dwiggins / Charlotte Ereckson vs Karla Jenkins / Leslee Herling4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-04-02vs McKinney/Mutter W7.0Won 20
W#2 DoublesJill Kennedy / Cindy Neyland vs Julie Hansen / Zarlita Wright6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMary Ann Walters / Mary Dwiggins vs Joan Thorne / Doreen McDonnell6-2, 6-2
2025-03-21vs LifeTime Plano/Freshwater W7.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesCynthia Collins / Mary Ann Walters vs Barb O'Rear / Page Schreck3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDebra Driscoll / Margaret Cooley vs Carol Carr / Erin Treloar4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTeri Wilson / Charlotte Ereckson vs Lisa Marvel / Suvanee Chirachanchai6-4, 6-2
2025-03-14vs High Point/Carson-Blocker W7.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesCindy Neyland / Margaret Cooley vs Renee Simpson / Miki Carson7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJill Kennedy / Debra Driscoll vs Kathy Battad / Nan Morrow3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMary Dwiggins / Teri Wilson vs Gerda Heidemann / Gail Blocker6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for W7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Teri Wilson
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.51
Margaret Cooley
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.49
Debra Driscoll
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.33
Mary Ann Walters
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
Cindy Neyland
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.24
Charlotte Ereckson
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Judy Archbold
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Dwiggins
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Mary Martinez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nancy Lacey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debra Driscoll + Mary Ann Walters404 matchesnot enough data
Mary Ann Walters + Margaret Cooley314 matchesnot enough data
Debra Driscoll + Margaret Cooley303 matchesnot enough data
Mary Ann Walters + Teri Wilson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Teri Wilson
37W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
Margaret Cooley
41W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.51
3.5
Debra Driscoll
68W–25L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
3.49
Mary Ann Walters
17W–10L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Cindy Neyland
4W–2L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Charlotte Ereckson
8W–2L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Judy Archbold
10W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Dwiggins
14W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Martinez
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Lacey
8W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.