Teams

MARIN TC 40MX9.0A

2022 MIXED 40&Over · 40&Over MX9.0

25 players · average NTRP 4.33 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 40&Over MX9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.00 estimated across 23 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.45
Michael Damiani
published
4.41
Kristin Morrell
published
4.31
Jennifer Mills
published
4.30
4.28
Steve Schreck
published
4.27
4.26
Favio de Marco
published 4.5
Chris Trepte
published 4.5
4.22
Kiran F Narsinh
published
4.21
Loren Quaglieri
published 4.5
4.16
Brooke Juhl
published 4.5
4.07
Jonathan Lefferts
published
3.96
Amy See
published 4.5
3.91
3.81
Carnet Williams
published 4
3.80
Nancy Martin
published
3.78
Robert Ahearn
published
3.77
Jeffery Birkenseer
published
3.77
Karla Boisvert
published
Emily Birkenseer
published 4
3.72
Elaine Kitano
published 4
3.67
Jason Holmes
published
3.65
Samuel Pleasure
published
3.62
Thomas Chang
published
3.61
Susan Swezy
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Damiani
20W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
4.45
Kristin Morrell
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
75%25%<1%
4.41
Jennifer Mills
16W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
4.31
Kimberly Borah-Schulist
9W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.30
Steve Schreck
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
4.28
4.5
Christine Costamagna
10W–4L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Favio de Marco
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
4.26
4.5
Chris Trepte
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kiran F Narsinh
10W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%4%96%
4.22
4.5
Loren Quaglieri
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
4.21
4.5
Brooke Juhl
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
4.16
Jonathan Lefferts
5W–9L career · no lines in 2022
28%71%<1%
4.07
4.5
Amy See
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
3.96
Michael Lustenberger
18W–20L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Carnet Williams
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
Nancy Martin
6W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
Robert Ahearn
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.78
Jeffery Birkenseer
7W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%2%98%
3.77
Karla Boisvert
11W–6L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Emily Birkenseer
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Elaine Kitano
14W–9L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.72
Jason Holmes
17W–9L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.67
Samuel Pleasure
13W–9L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
Thomas Chang
9W–7L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.62
Susan Swezy
10W–7L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.61

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.