Teams

OKWC/Mullenix/65&over7.0W

2025 TUL ADULT 65 & Over League · 7.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-11vs Fraser/PHLost 12
W#1 DoublesKarin Duke / Rebekah Herrick vs Kathleen Harris / Beth Latham6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesLucy Moon / Joanne Ames vs Terry Largent / Gail Kelly2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDeborah Austin Johnson / Mia Vahlberg vs Sandra Fraser / Jo Clark1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-05-04vs Ford/LFWon 21
W#1 DoublesKarin Duke / Vanessa Hutto vs Deborah Hale / Shari Singleton6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCindy Noyes / Rebekah Herrick vs Melynda Stone / Nancy Burris6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesGloria Mullenix / Mia Vahlberg vs Debbie Archer / Elizabeth Webster6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2025-04-13vs Fraser/PHWon 21
W#1 DoublesGloria Mullenix / Mia Vahlberg vs Gail Kelly / Terry Largent6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCindy Noyes / Vanessa Hutto vs Jo Clark / Paula Marshall6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJoanne Ames / Cindy Garrett vs Kimberly Jones / Susan Clifton5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2025-04-06vs Ford/LFWon 21
W#1 DoublesKarin Duke / Vanessa Hutto vs Vickie Ford / Nancy Burris6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesGloria Mullenix / Mia Vahlberg vs Deborah Hale / Shari Singleton6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCindy Garrett / Roxanna Hanseth vs Elizabeth Webster / Debbie Archer7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2025-03-23vs Fraser/PHLost 12
L#1 DoublesKarin Duke / Vanessa Hutto vs Terry Largent / Gail Kelly4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesGloria Mullenix / Cindy Garrett vs Sandra Fraser / Jo Clark6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLucy Moon / Deborah Austin Johnson vs Kimberly Jones / Susan Clifton2-6, 4-6
2025-03-09vs Ford/LFWon 21
W#1 DoublesKarin Duke / Vanessa Hutto vs Chrisanne Nelson / Elizabeth Webster5-2
W#2 DoublesGloria Mullenix / Mia Vahlberg vs Debbie Archer / Rebecca Thomaselli6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCindy Noyes / Roxanna Hanseth vs Nancy Burris / Becky Newport4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 7.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OKWC/Mullenix/65&over7.0W4210817156
2Fraser/PH339921162
3Ford/LF2481024179

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Cindy Noyes
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Karin Duke
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Vanessa Hutto
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.09
Roxanna Hanseth
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Joanne Ames
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.04
Mia Vahlberg
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.03
Gloria Mullenix
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.00
Rebekah Herrick
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.56
Deborah Austin Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Lucy Moon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Noyes + Rebekah Herrick3349% games+11.3% vs expected
Joanne Ames + Lucy Moon11853% games+1.2% vs expected
Vanessa Hutto + Karin Duke483354% games−0.5% vs expected
Cindy Noyes + Gloria Mullenix2445% games−3.8% vs expected
Gloria Mullenix + Vanessa Hutto5159% games−4.2% vs expected
Gloria Mullenix + Mia Vahlberg121548% games−8.8% vs expected
Roxanna Hanseth + Lucy Moon0735% gamesnot enough data
Roxanna Hanseth + Vanessa Hutto1540% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cindy Noyes
31W–49L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Karin Duke
115W–78L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Vanessa Hutto
109W–87L career · 5 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
Roxanna Hanseth
16W–38L career · 2 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
Joanne Ames
39W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.04
Mia Vahlberg
32W–67L career · 5 lines in 2025
38%61%<1%
3.04
Gloria Mullenix
67W–91L career · 5 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.03
Rebekah Herrick
114W–77L career · 2 lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.00
3
Deborah Austin Johnson
39W–59L career · 4 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
2.56
Lucy Moon
20W–37L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.