Teams

WNCK Kneier (Aston Park)

Tri-Level 18 & Over USTA WNC 2025 · 18+ Women 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-22vs WNCS LaChance (Aston Park)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesVivian Gibson / Beth Meacham vs ASHLEY MORAN / Lauren Wood6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKelly Gillis / Alexis Rosenfelt vs Eva Tune / Lisa Young3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKathy Jones / Susanne Loar vs Michelle Pugliese / Kelley Stines4-6, 5-7
2025-07-19vs WNCC Anders (ARC-South)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesTricia Reeks / Janet Sweezey vs Jane Christen / Karolina Drozdz6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSusan Walker / Jenna Winfield vs Andi Elliot / Rebecca Carchman7-6, 7-5
L#3 DoublesSusanne Loar / Kathy Jones vs Holly Renfro / Quenton Wright0-6, 1-6
2025-07-15vs WNCC Anders (ARC-South)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesBeth Meacham / Janet Sweezey vs Rebecca Carchman / Rosie Levine5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKimberly Kneier / Susan Walker vs Audrey Fortezzo / Karolina Drozdz6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMelissa Johnson / Amanda Ashbrook vs Cari Common / Holly Renfro1-6, 3-6
2025-07-08vs WNCD Andrews (ARC-South)Won 30
W#1 DoublesBeth Meacham / Vivian Gibson vs Vickie Massey / Tina Kinard6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKelly Gillis / Jenna Winfield vs Susan Cook / Danielle Andrews6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesEmily Eng / Amanda Ashbrook vs Sammie Vittoria / Nicole O'Brien6-2, 6-3
2025-07-01vs WNCD Andrews (ARC-South)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesTricia Reeks / Margaret Deutsch vs Mary Ann Wendel / Alexandra Moody3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJenna Winfield / Alexis Rosenfelt vs Kari Hubbard / Christine Carson6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMelissa Johnson / Amanda Ashbrook vs Jennifer Malt / Kelly McDill2-6, 3-6
2025-06-17vs WNCS LaChance (Aston Park)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesTricia Reeks / Vivian Gibson vs Erica Roberts / ASHLEY MORAN2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKelly Gillis / Kimberly Kneier vs Nicole Ingle / Jennifer Yeisley6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesEmily Eng / Susanne Loar vs Michelle Pugliese / Zsuzsanna Brooks2-6, 4-6
2025-06-10vs WNCD Andrews (ARC-South)Won 21
L#1 DoublesVivian Gibson / Tricia Reeks vs Alexandra Moody / Susan Cook3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJenna Winfield / Kimberly Kneier vs Alice Chen / Danielle Andrews6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMelissa Johnson / Susanne Loar vs Sammie Vittoria / Debbie Berry7-5, 6-3
2025-06-03vs WNCC Anders (ARC-South)Split 11
L#1 DoublesBeth Meacham / Vivian Gibson vs Jane Christen / Anne Salter3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Walker / Kelly Gillis vs Audrey Fortezzo / Kelly Olesiuk6-2, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18+ Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Jenna Winfield
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
3.82
Margaret Deutsch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Kelly Gillis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Beth Meacham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Janet Sweezey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Vivian Gibson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Tricia Reeks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Alexis Rosenfelt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.77
Amanda Ashbrook
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Susanne Loar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Emily Eng
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kimberly Kneier
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Meacham + Vivian Gibson3644% games+3.2% vs expected
Janet Sweezey + Beth Meacham044 matchesnot enough data
Tricia Reeks + Beth Meacham213 matchesnot enough data
Beth Meacham + Margaret Deutsch303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jenna Winfield
21W–3L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.94
Margaret Deutsch
98W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Kelly Gillis
58W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.71
4
Beth Meacham
30W–35L career · 4 lines in 2025
13%87%1%
3.66
Janet Sweezey
17W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.64
Vivian Gibson
20W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
3.48
Tricia Reeks
12W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Alexis Rosenfelt
8W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.36
3
Amanda Ashbrook
8W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Susanne Loar
19W–28L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
2.73
Emily Eng
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kimberly Kneier
8W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.