Teams

Nixon/Priest 40s 4.0 Thurs PM

2025 Piedmont USTA 40 & Over · WOMEN 4.0 40 & Over

17 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-08vs Warrick 40s 4.0W Thurs PMSplit 11
L#1 DoublesIbby Greene / Sherrie Kruse vs Marianna Bryce / Paige Yates4-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTheresa Dubiel / Evelyn Strader vs Catherine Stopka / Donna Warrick6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 DoublesYvonne Singh / Ibby Greene vs Bonnie Satterfield / Joy Martin6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSallye Parker / Adriana Hernandez vs Terri Shantry / Lynda Guarnieri4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDell Barbee / Theresa Dubiel vs Trish Holder / Tammie Hughes6-4, 6-0
2025-04-24vs Yates 40s 4.0W Thurs PMLost 01
L#3 DoublesEvelyn Strader / Mary Fowler vs Andrea Jones / Stephanie Gilmer7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2025-04-17vs Goy 40s 4.0W Thurs PMLost 01
L#2 DoublesSherrie Kruse / Carolyn Pellerin vs Judiann Georgevich / Gina Goy6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesYvonne Singh / Ibby Greene vs Lisa Andree / Pamela Hughes6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDell Barbee / Lynn Chafin vs Jill Perez / Bonita Johnson7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMary Fowler / Vicky Bethel vs Suzanne Johnson / Cheryl Bock3-6, 2-6
2025-03-27vs Beck 40s 4.0W Thurs PMWon 30
W#1 DoublesYvonne Singh / Theresa Dubiel vs Gladys Dunn / Anita Allis6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDell Barbee / Barbara Fry vs Kathy Chinnis / silvina piotti6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJean Schmid / Vicky Bethel vs Elia Mavronikolas / Tiffany Weeks6-2, 6-0
2025-03-20vs Adams 40s 4.0W Thurs PMLost 01
L#2 DoublesSherrie Kruse / Evelyn Strader vs Susan Roach / Layne Saunders4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-03-13vs Brown 40s 4.0W Thurs PMWon 10
W#1 DoublesAdriana Hernandez / Sherrie Kruse vs Kathy Hedgecock / Tammy Dickenson7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Ibby Greene
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Adriana Hernandez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Theresa Dubiel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.65
Dell Barbee
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.65
Yvonne Singh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.61
Carolyn Pellerin
published 4
3.60
Barbara Fry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Sallye Parker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Lynn Chafin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Keevie Martin
published
3.45
Evelyn Strader
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Mary Fowler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Gwenda Priest
published
3.36
Jean Schmid
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Mary Ann Nixon
published
3.29
Vicky Bethel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sherrie Kruse
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Barbara Fry + Yvonne Singh5066% games+1.8% vs expected
Vicky Bethel + Jean Schmid3447% games−7.7% vs expected
Evelyn Strader + Sherrie Kruse2746% gamesnot enough data
Mary Fowler + Mary Ann Nixon1638% gamesnot enough data
Mary Fowler + Sallye Parker2546% gamesnot enough data
Vicky Bethel + Mary Fowler033 matchesnot enough data
Evelyn Strader + Mary Ann Nixon213 matchesnot enough data
Mary Ann Nixon + Gwenda Priest123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ibby Greene
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.90
4
Adriana Hernandez
6W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Theresa Dubiel
48W–51L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.67
4
Dell Barbee
17W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
Yvonne Singh
13W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.65
4
Carolyn Pellerin
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
4
Barbara Fry
11W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
Sallye Parker
146W–124L career · 1 line in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.59
Lynn Chafin
10W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%35%65%
3.56
Keevie Martin
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.50
Evelyn Strader
66W–110L career · 6 lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
3.45
Mary Fowler
67W–79L career · 1 line in 2025
80%20%<1%
3.38
Gwenda Priest
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
3.38
Jean Schmid
4W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
84%16%<1%
3.36
Mary Ann Nixon
35W–46L career · no lines in 2025
86%14%<1%
3.35
Vicky Bethel
4W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
3.29
Sherrie Kruse
32W–60L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.