Teams

Yates 40s 4.0W Thurs PM

2025 Piedmont USTA 40 & Over · WOMEN 4.0 40 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-08vs Goy 40s 4.0W Thurs PMWon 21
W#1 DoublesKathryn Fleihan / Jennifer Tewksbury vs Judiann Georgevich / Clarissa Tatum6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesChrista Wykoff / Andrea Jones vs Gina Goy / Linda Hestenes5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPatty Craig / LaJean Morrow Smith vs Paula Gebhard / Melissa Damsen6-3, 6-3
2025-05-01vs Beck 40s 4.0W Thurs PMWon 21
L#1 DoublesChrista Wykoff / LaJean Morrow Smith vs Allenoush Beard / Anita Allis6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesClaudia Rodriguez / Patty Craig vs Elia Mavronikolas / Gwen Highsmith-Quick6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJennifer Yates / Allison Walsh vs Cynthia Beck / silvina piotti3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-04-10vs Warrick 40s 4.0W Thurs PMLost 12
L#1 DoublesKathryn Fleihan / Jennifer Tewksbury vs Marianna Bryce / Paige Yates2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPatty Craig / Kelly Pryzwansky vs Dabney Porter / Donna Warrick0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesClaudia Rodriguez / Christa Wykoff vs Karrie Manson / Catherine Stopka1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 DoublesJennifer Tewksbury / Kathryn Fleihan vs Cheryl Bock / Jill Perez7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLynette Paley / Allison Walsh vs Lisa Andree / Kim Taylor6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesKelly Pryzwansky / Andrea Jones vs Marlene Crewes / Denise Fiery6-3, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Patty Craig
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.37
Lynette Paley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Christa Wykoff
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.24
Allison Walsh
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Stephanie Gilmer
published
3.14
LaJean Morrow Smith
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.12
Kathryn Fleihan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.11
Andrea Jones
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.04
Jennifer Yates
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jennifer Tewksbury
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kelly Pryzwansky
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Kim Kyle
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathryn Fleihan + Jennifer Tewksbury3346% games−0.2% vs expected
Jennifer Yates + Allison Walsh1441% gamesnot enough data
Kathryn Fleihan + Stephanie Gilmer123 matchesnot enough data
Christa Wykoff + Patty Craig123 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Gilmer + LaJean Morrow Smith213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Patty Craig
32W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
Lynette Paley
11W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Christa Wykoff
34W–25L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Allison Walsh
20W–27L career · 6 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Stephanie Gilmer
11W–25L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
LaJean Morrow Smith
11W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.14
Kathryn Fleihan
30W–35L career · 6 lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Andrea Jones
2W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Jennifer Yates
8W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.04
Jennifer Tewksbury
10W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kelly Pryzwansky
15W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kim Kyle
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.