Teams

GOLDMAN TC CW7.5A

2025 COMBO · Women 7.5

22 players · average NTRP 3.70 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-11-02vs PENINSULA GCC CW7.5ALost 02
L#1 DoublesClaire Sheehan / Suratwadee Lakornwong vs Danielle Kling / Courtney Nicoletti4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTammy Mason / Amanda Chen vs Meaghan Schaefer / Sara Weaver2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 DoublesJanis Porto / Erin Schafer vs Janet Arnesty / Jacinta Mccann6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMaria Vegas / Riyalyne Kim Zabat vs Paula Mangin / Kristen Steck6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMargaret Stevenson / Katie Bernardez vs Amy Kleckner / Daphne Zenk6-0, 6-1
2025-10-06vs GOLDMAN TC CW7.5CSplit 11
L#1 DoublesFrancesca Vera / Tamara York vs Christina Chan-Pong / Christina Pham2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesStacy Harvey / Jenny Huynh vs Sabrina Yeung / Nina Kim6-0, 6-4
L#1 DoublesMimi Wong / Margaret Stevenson vs Laura Kelly / Pearl Villena5-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKatie Bernardez / Katrina Salsburey vs Patti O'Kelly / Kristen Steck3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesStephanie Chang / Tamara York vs Adrienne Ladd / Daphne Zenk7-6, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Claire Louie
published 4
3.88
Francesca Vera
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.80
Serene Lai
published
3.79
Erin Schafer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.74
Tamara York
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.73
Maggie Ho
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Katie Bernardez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.60
Suratwadee Lakornwong
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Brooke Elmlinger
published 4
3.56
Riyalyne Kim Zabat
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.53
Maria Vegas
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.53
Tammy Mason
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Cef Ella
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.44
Joni Fuse
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.43
Jennifer Bernardez
published
3.25
Amy Jang
published 3.5
3.18
Diana Motseniat
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Janis Porto
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jenny Huynh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Katrina Salsburey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Margaret Stevenson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Suzanne Nick
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Suratwadee Lakornwong + Cef Ella9063% games+4.7% vs expected
Maria Vegas + Serene Lai224 matchesnot enough data
Maggie Ho + Joni Fuse314 matchesnot enough data
Riyalyne Kim Zabat + Cef Ella314 matchesnot enough data
Suratwadee Lakornwong + Riyalyne Kim Zabat303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Claire Louie
9W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.90
Francesca Vera
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.88
Serene Lai
22W–18L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.80
Erin Schafer
5W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.79
Tamara York
12W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
Maggie Ho
14W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%2%
3.73
Katie Bernardez
7W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.67
Suratwadee Lakornwong
32W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.60
4
Brooke Elmlinger
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.59
Riyalyne Kim Zabat
24W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.56
Maria Vegas
27W–36L career · 5 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.53
Tammy Mason
8W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.53
3.5
Cef Ella
17W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%54%46%
3.49
Joni Fuse
13W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
3.44
Jennifer Bernardez
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Amy Jang
7W–11L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Diana Motseniat
23W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Janis Porto
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jenny Huynh
9W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Katrina Salsburey
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Margaret Stevenson
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Suzanne Nick
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.