Teams

GOLDMAN TC CW7.5C

2025 COMBO · Women 7.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-10-06vs GOLDMAN TC CW7.5ALost 12
W#1 DoublesChristina Chan-Pong / Christina Pham vs Francesca Vera / Tamara York6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEmily Steinglass / Christine Yeh vs Maggie Ho / Joni Fuse3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSabrina Yeung / Nina Kim vs Stacy Harvey / Jenny Huynh0-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesKarissa Watanabe / Nina Kim vs Laura Kelly / Pearl Villena6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnnie Yang / Sirisha Nandipati vs Patti O'Kelly / Karen Brandman6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesEmily Steinglass / Christine Yeh vs Adrienne Ladd / Karen Forsthoff6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Abbey Moore
published 4
3.88
Amy Jiang
published 4
3.77
Surabhi Godbole
published
3.76
Emily Steinglass
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.76
Karissa Watanabe
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.74
Gina Tsui
published
3.74
Christine Yeh
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.72
Lily Tan
published
3.72
Yvonne Lin
published
3.72
Natalie Batlin
published
3.64
Sirisha Nandipati
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Christina Chan-Pong
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.54
May-Fei Lee
published
3.53
Annie Yang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.43
Sabrina Yeung
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Alanna Hale
published 3.5
3.13
Nina Kim
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Maurene Jiang
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Abbey Moore
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.94
4
Amy Jiang
18W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.88
Surabhi Godbole
9W–1L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Emily Steinglass
9W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.76
Karissa Watanabe
12W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.76
Gina Tsui
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Christine Yeh
15W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.74
Lily Tan
12W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.72
Yvonne Lin
12W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.72
Natalie Batlin
20W–20L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Sirisha Nandipati
18W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
16%84%1%
3.64
3.5
Christina Chan-Pong
12W–2L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.60
May-Fei Lee
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.54
4
Annie Yang
8W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.53
Sabrina Yeung
5W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
70%30%<1%
3.43
3.5
Alanna Hale
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.25
Nina Kim
9W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
Maurene Jiang
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.