Teams

Men's Quads

2025 NOGTA Quads - Summer · Quads

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Quads have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Gary Quast
published
3.29
Jacob Quast
published
3.15
Jack Sismour
published
3.11
Brian Hammontree
published 3.5
3.06
Scott King
published
3.02
David Locke
published 3.5
2.98
Phil Johnson
published
2.67
James Stanfield
published
2.65
Gene King
published
2.55
Santiago Angel
published
2.55
Lee Carroll
published
Dean Puryear
published
Jim Richards
published
Manuel Guzman
published
Zach Jones
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Hammontree + Scott King5072% games+12.9% vs expected
Phil Johnson + Gireeshkumar Gopinathakaimal3254% gamesnot enough data
Brian Hammontree + David Locke404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Gireeshkumar Gopinathakaimal
8W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.33
Gary Quast
3W–24L career · no lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.30
Jacob Quast
23W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.29
Jack Sismour
12W–24L career · no lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.15
3.5
Brian Hammontree
30W–7L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Scott King
42W–12L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.06
3.5
David Locke
36W–11L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.02
Phil Johnson
3W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
James Stanfield
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
Gene King
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
2.65
Santiago Angel
2W–12L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
Lee Carroll
13W–35L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
Dean Puryear
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jim Richards
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Manuel Guzman
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Zach Jones
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.