Teams

Bennett, Connie

2025 Adult 65 & Over 6.0 - 9.0 · 7.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-06-06vs Kochersperger, CindySplit 11
L#1 DoublesCandace Herman / Cathy Rinehart vs Cathy Jarrett / Amy Shropshire4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNancy Ifft / Anne Miller vs Janet Crawford / Cindy Kochersperger6-3, 6-3
2025-05-30vs HOA/Jacelone/65&over7.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesNancy Connell / Barbara Wood vs Marcia Jacelone / Lori Ambroske7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDelane Cohen / Candace Herman vs Linda Shinn / Patty Morton6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesNancy Kitts / Stephanie Gunderson vs Ann Crampton / Elaine Schulze1-6, 2-6
2025-05-23vs Lagerstrom, ClaudiaLost 12
W#1 DoublesDelane Cohen / Anne Miller vs Hildegard McManus / Kathy Bazzell6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNancy Kitts / Nancy Ifft vs Kristine Schrock / Pam Kerr5-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesBarbara Wood / Candace Herman vs Muriel Hull / Gayle Osborne4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-05-16vs Robertson, MarciaWon 30
W#1 DoublesDelane Cohen / Anne Miller vs Diane Freeman / Connie Johnson6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBarbara Wood / Stephanie Gunderson vs Donna Turnbull / Patty Jensen7-6, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRhonda Gilstrap / Susan Ferguson vs Kay Turman / Irene Harkleroad6-1, 6-2
2025-05-09vs True, JaneWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnne Miller / Delane Cohen vs Ami Horton / Kelly Nulan6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCandace Herman / Cathy Rinehart vs Jane True / Cheryl Churchman6-7, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSusan Ferguson / Nancy Connell vs Jane Slavik / Laura Thompson6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Delane Cohen
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.41
Nancy Connell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.29
Stephanie Gunderson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Barbara Wood
published 3.5
3.21
Candace Herman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.10
Rhonda Gilstrap
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Cathy Rinehart
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.06
Nancy Ifft
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.96
Nancy Kitts
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Susan Ferguson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Delane Cohen + Candace Herman10457% games+6.2% vs expected
Rhonda Gilstrap + Susan Ferguson19957% games+4.2% vs expected
Candace Herman + Cathy Rinehart231953% games+1.9% vs expected
Rhonda Gilstrap + Nancy Ifft5454% games−1.9% vs expected
Stephanie Gunderson + Candace Herman3845% games−2.3% vs expected
Stephanie Gunderson + Nancy Ifft5348% games−2.4% vs expected
Candace Herman + Nancy Ifft4450% games−3.6% vs expected
Stephanie Gunderson + Rhonda Gilstrap224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Delane Cohen
107W–44L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
Nancy Connell
40W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%76%23%
3.41
Stephanie Gunderson
93W–75L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Barbara Wood
55W–60L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Candace Herman
162W–139L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.21
Rhonda Gilstrap
67W–69L career · 1 line in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Cathy Rinehart
111W–81L career · 2 lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
3.09
Nancy Ifft
71W–72L career · 2 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.06
Nancy Kitts
38W–91L career · 2 lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.96
Susan Ferguson
56W–40L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.