Teams

Robertson, Marcia

2025 Adult 65 & Over 6.0 - 9.0 · 7.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-06-06vs Lagerstrom, ClaudiaLost 12
L#1 DoublesKathy Loepp / Maryanne Loscalzo vs Janet Beasing / Leslie Stelzer1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDiane Freeman / Marcia Robertson vs Kathy Bazzell / Roberta Dierks2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCarol Levalley / Donna Turnbull vs Muriel Hull / Pam Kerr4-6, 1-6
2025-05-30vs Kochersperger, CindyLost 02
L#1 DoublesKathy Loepp / Maryanne Loscalzo vs Amy Shropshire / Cindy Kochersperger4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesIrene Harkleroad / Kay Turman vs Susan Winn / Mary Weaver5-7, 0-6
2025-05-23vs True, JaneLost 12
W#1 DoublesDiane Freeman / Marcia Robertson vs Laura Thompson / Pamela ODonnell6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCarol Levalley / Patty Jensen vs Cheryl Churchman / Jane True4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesIrene Harkleroad / Kay Turman vs Susan Walker / Kelly Nulan4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-05-16vs Bennett, ConnieLost 02
L#2 DoublesDonna Turnbull / Patty Jensen vs Barbara Wood / Stephanie Gunderson6-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKay Turman / Irene Harkleroad vs Rhonda Gilstrap / Susan Ferguson1-6, 2-6
2025-05-09vs HOA/Jacelone/65&over7.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesDiane Freeman / Marcia Robertson vs MaryAnn Luchtel / Lori Ambroske0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKathy Loepp / Maryanne Loscalzo vs Ann Crampton / Patsy Crystal3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesConnie Johnson / Carol Levalley vs Marla Lovinggood / Maria Moore0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 7.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HOA/Jacelone/65&over7.0W50132896
2Lagerstrom, Claudia4110513111
3Kochersperger, Cindy237818130
4True, Jane1431227174
5Robertson, Marcia0521328176

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.75
Maryanne Loscalzo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Connie Johnson
published 3
Diane Freeman
published 3
2.73
Patty Jensen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.72
Carol Levalley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.69
Marcia Robertson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.62
Kathy Loepp
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.61
Donna Turnbull
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.46
Irene Harkleroad
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kay Turman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathy Loepp + Maryanne Loscalzo71544% games+1.2% vs expected
Carol Levalley + Marcia Robertson5847% games−2.2% vs expected
Kathy Loepp + Connie Johnson2442% games−5.6% vs expected
Donna Turnbull + Marcia Robertson4350% games−6.3% vs expected
Carol Levalley + Donna Turnbull3545% games−7.8% vs expected
Patty Jensen + Maryanne Loscalzo1631% games−9.9% vs expected
Diane Freeman + Marcia Robertson3346% games−11.3% vs expected
Carol Levalley + Kathy Loepp2446% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maryanne Loscalzo
28W–79L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Connie Johnson
36W–46L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Diane Freeman
9W–18L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Patty Jensen
21W–57L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Carol Levalley
48W–62L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
2.72
Marcia Robertson
48W–57L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Kathy Loepp
41W–74L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.62
Donna Turnbull
44W–54L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.61
Irene Harkleroad
9W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.46
Kay Turman
0W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.