Teams

SLKAtkins/Pen

2022 Lake 18 & Over Summer Singles · Women 3.5

6 players · average NTRP 3.70 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-08-01vs SLKChilders/TrumpSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAlicia Bowman vs Lisa Schacher2-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesAnn Modlin vs Kimberly Stark6-2, 6-1
2022-07-25vs SLKBienstock/LNTC 3.5Split 11
L#2 SinglesKim Kelly Senff vs Kristine Bienstock6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesAnn Modlin vs Cyndi Johnson7-6, 6-1
2022-07-18Won 10
W#1 SinglesMary Kay Portaro vs Mandy Alexander6-4, 6-3
2022-07-11vs SLKChilders/TrumpLost 02
L#1 SinglesJenny Yaudes vs MaryGwen Murash1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesAlicia Bowman vs Lisa Schacher4-6, 0-6
2022-07-07vs SLKBienstock/LNTC 3.5Won 10
W#3 SinglesAlicia Bowman vs Anna Bonham6-4, 6-3
2022-06-20Split 11
L#2 SinglesKim Kelly Senff vs Kimberly Stark2-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesAnn Modlin vs Brenda Zino7-5, 6-1
2022-06-13Split 11
W#2 SinglesKim Kelly Senff vs Robin Underwood6-3, 6-1
L#3 SinglesAnn Modlin vs Sarah Norton2-6, 2-6
2022-06-06vs SLBBoucher-Smith/JettonSplit 11
L#1 SinglesJenny Yaudes vs Jessica Benningfield2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 SinglesMary Kay Portaro vs Karen Haigney6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
KC Bywater
published
3.79
Jenny Yaudes
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.59
Mary Kay Portaro
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.50
Kim Kelly Senff
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.42
Alicia Bowman
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Ann Modlin
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Kay Portaro + Kim Kelly Senff5360% gamesnot enough data
Jenny Yaudes + Kim Kelly Senff3254% gamesnot enough data
Alicia Bowman + Mary Kay Portaro314 matchesnot enough data
Jenny Yaudes + Mary Kay Portaro224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

KC Bywater
12W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
Jenny Yaudes
175W–119L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Mary Kay Portaro
123W–94L career · 2 lines in 2022
23%76%<1%
3.59
3.5
Kim Kelly Senff
144W–103L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%50%50%
3.50
3.5
Alicia Bowman
100W–83L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Ann Modlin
82W–135L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
3.35

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.