Teams

Fall Winners /Longshore Lake - Hayes

2025 Collier Adult 18 & Over ESL Fall · Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-12-12vs Naples Bay Resort - HirschWon 30
W#1 DoublesAndy Jhanji / Fred Weinman vs David Wenstrup / Greg Donahue6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRob Fox / Joseph Grabowski vs Chadwick Commers / Joseph Kardek6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCharles Hayes / Mark Barrett vs Shep Burr / David Ray6-3, 6-2
2024-12-05vs Cambier - PackoWon 10
W#3 DoublesJames Foley / Mark Barrett vs David Crisp / Thomas Massey6-0, 6-2
2024-11-07Won 10
W#3 DoublesJames Foley / Thomas Stefaniuk vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-10-31vs Cambier - PackoWon 10
W#3 DoublesJames Foley / Mark Barrett vs John Franta / Mike Myers6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Andy Jhanji
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.94
Fred Weinman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.91
Thomas Stefaniuk
published
3.87
Kenneth Connelly
published
3.86
Jay Freedman
published
3.84
Dan Scardino
published 4
3.82
Joseph Grabowski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.74
Dan Gustafson
published 4
3.57
Heath Rozin
published
3.54
Mark Barrett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Charles Hayes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
James Foley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Matt Edwards
published
Maurice Amsellem
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andy Jhanji + Fred Weinman14361% games+4.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andy Jhanji
26W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.95
Fred Weinman
21W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.94
Thomas Stefaniuk
11W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%25%
3.91
Kenneth Connelly
13W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.87
Jay Freedman
62W–49L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.86
4
Dan Scardino
15W–15L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.84
Joseph Grabowski
8W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Dan Gustafson
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
4%92%3%
3.74
Heath Rozin
4W–10L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.57
Mark Barrett
8W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
38%61%<1%
3.54
4
Charles Hayes
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.52
James Foley
126W–72L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Matt Edwards
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Maurice Amsellem
5W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rathinivethan Kanjamalai
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.