Teams

Naples Bay Resort - Hirsch

2025 Collier Adult 18 & Over ESL Fall · Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.90 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
L#1 DoublesDavid Wenstrup / Greg Donahue vs Andy Jhanji / Fred Weinman3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesChadwick Commers / Joseph Kardek vs Rob Fox / Joseph Grabowski3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesShep Burr / David Ray vs Charles Hayes / Mark Barrett3-6, 2-6
2024-12-05vs Longshore Lake - McWatersWon 10
W#3 DoublesMichael Schrock / David Ray vs Robert Folger / Jordan Martin6-2, 0-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Dana Mcilwain
published 4
David Ray
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
David Wenstrup
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Thomas Hirsch
published
3.68
Chadwick Commers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Bryan Fowler
published 3.5
3.52
Joseph Kardek
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Shep Burr
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Donald Scanlon
published
Greg Donahue
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Masius
published
Michael Schrock
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donald Scanlon + Greg Donahue15265% gamesnot enough data
Dana Mcilwain + Thomas Hirsch6257% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dana Mcilwain
10W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.84
4
David Ray
0W–1L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4
David Wenstrup
49W–39L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Thomas Hirsch
11W–11L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Chadwick Commers
4W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
3.5
Bryan Fowler
10W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.58
Joseph Kardek
11W–39L career · 1 line in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.52
Shep Burr
17W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.45
Donald Scanlon
31W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Greg Donahue
21W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Michael Masius
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Mullenmeister
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Schrock
54W–77L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.