Teams

CDTA S TriW3.5/4.0/4.5 b.Lake Bluff Goldberg Sun 4 $20

CDTA Summer Tri Level · CDTA S Tri Women 3.5

22 players · average NTRP 4.16 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesKatharine Cole / Claire Buehler vs Bela Starkman / Desiree Witte6-1, 7-5
2023-08-20Won 10
W#1 DoublesShana Cal / Haina Shin vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 DoublesSarah Paulson / Shana Cal vs Susan Rudolphi / Cyndy Krietsch6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTonya Pfeifle / Sophie Dimoff vs Patricia Bustamante / Marina Minkina7-5, 7-6
W#3 DoublesTonya Pfeifle / Rachel Orlowski vs Magdalena Galinska / Leah Cannon6-3, 6-2
W#1 DoublesLaura Seaman / Katharine Cole vs Cyndy Krietsch / Susan Rudolphi6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTonya Pfeifle / Liza Spinazze vs Christine Handel / Irene Okada6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesPriscilla Ewaldz / Allison Goldberg vs Renee Buxton / Eileen Lee6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSophie Dimoff / Rachel Orlowski vs Leah Cannon / Magdalena Galinska6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTonya Pfeifle / Sophie Dimoff vs Christina Greeley / Narissa Breger6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · CDTA S Tri Women 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S TriW3.5/4.0/4.5 b.Lake Bluff Goldberg Sun 4 $20802227135
2CDTA S TriW3.5/4.0/4.5 c.Tam Landt Sun 5 $2244131125213
3CDTA S TriW3.5/4.0/4.5 d.Tam Corey Thur 7 $2244111329210
4CDTA S TriW3.5/4.0/4.5 a.MT Bann(OUT) Zusman Sat 12 $253581634247
5CDTA S TriW3.5/4.0/4.5 e.LifeSport (OUT) Kiernan Sat 9 $231761838244
6zDROPPEDz CDTA S TriW3.5/4.0/4.5 f.Biltmore Szela Sun 3 $20000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.91 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Claire Buehler
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.28
Katharine Cole
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Elizabeth Brownson
published 4.5
4.11
Christine Meade
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.11
Heather Stenmark
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.10
Kimberly Horberg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.07
Shana Cal
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.02
Sophie Dimoff
published
3.96
Huan Chang
published 4
3.95
Haina Shin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.95
Laura Seaman
published
3.92
Allison Goldberg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.91
Liza Spinazze
published
3.81
Tonya Pfeifle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Abbey Perl
published 4
3.70
Priscilla Ewaldz
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.49
Marjorie Baltazar
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.42
Rachel Orlowski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Patricia Lozada
published
Caroline Werther
published 3.5
Lesa Vidovic
published
Sarah Paulson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katharine Cole + Huan Chang6166% games+10.5% vs expected
Patricia Lozada + Tonya Pfeifle2754% games+9.3% vs expected
Heather Stenmark + Elizabeth Brownson10659% games+5.6% vs expected
Heather Stenmark + Claire Buehler4359% games+5.5% vs expected
Heather Stenmark + Laura Seaman221554% games+0.9% vs expected
Priscilla Ewaldz + Christine Meade2449% games−0.3% vs expected
Shana Cal + Katharine Cole10855% games−1.2% vs expected
Shana Cal + Priscilla Ewaldz6752% games−1.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Claire Buehler
115W–77L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
4.36
4.5
Katharine Cole
114W–68L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%94%5%
4.28
4.5
Elizabeth Brownson
85W–54L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Christine Meade
279W–180L career · 6 lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
4.11
4.5
Heather Stenmark
278W–260L career · 5 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
4.11
4.5
Kimberly Horberg
92W–28L career · 4 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
4.10
4.5
Shana Cal
163W–131L career · 2 lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
4.07
Sophie Dimoff
78W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%45%55%
4.02
4
Huan Chang
201W–143L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Haina Shin
290W–131L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
3.95
Laura Seaman
68W–64L career · no lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
3.95
4
Allison Goldberg
145W–90L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.92
Liza Spinazze
149W–100L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.91
4
Tonya Pfeifle
154W–65L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Abbey Perl
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Priscilla Ewaldz
145W–184L career · 5 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Marjorie Baltazar
183W–85L career · 3 lines in 2023
54%46%<1%
3.49
3.5
Rachel Orlowski
61W–63L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.42
Patricia Lozada
164W–140L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Caroline Werther
12W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lesa Vidovic
34W–23L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sarah Paulson
12W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.